Talk:Danrin-ji

Japan Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks.JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations:
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This redirect should not be deleted

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Assuming Bueller 007 was entirely correct in his December 6th edit of Tenryū-ji, and accepting that his pithy comment was justified -- that "Danrin-ji link is self-referencing, and Danrin-ji itself is probably not worthy of an article" ....

Nevertheless, it does make sense to me that there should be a redirect link within the Wikipedia context. If someone begins a search for Danrin-ji -- knowing nothing except the name itself, what purpose is served by an unhelpful blank wall? Wikipedia's system would then invite the user to create a new article for a future Bueller 007 edit with a casually dismissive shrug.

In my view, this redirect should not be deleted without an expanded explanation; but I'd be interested in learning other points-of-view. --Ooperhoofd (talk) 15:13, 6 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

A page that knows where it met you.

This redirect should not be deleted