Talk:Dan Cox

Semi-protected edit request on 31 July 2022

Dan Cox is NOT far Right. He’s Republican. At this point that phase is being tossed around similar to the word racist and being used as a weapon. We see what you’re doing now. Grow up. 2601:150:4200:3B0:7118:FBCD:123:A961 (talk) 17:23, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Melmann 17:29, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Agreed. This is a slur used by the Maryland democrat majority to defame and slander any conservative that attempts to run against their candidate. And there WAS election tampering, ballot harvesting and the typical democrat gerrymandering. Something Maryland has become notorious for. One of the most gerrymandered democrat states in the Union. Now there is only one conservative congressman left, and they were planning to redistrict AGAIN for no valid reason other than to remove our one last conservative representative, Andy Harris. Until the court stepped in and stopped them. Cox's campaign can't be claimed an honest "loss" when Maryland's voter roles haven't been cleaned in years... purposely! I know everyone standing in line at my local poles voted for him. And we weren't "far right". Voters outside the cities are simply fiscal conservatives who love law and order as much a Maryland liberals love criminals, crime, chaos and corruption. 69.250.119.105 (talk) 05:42, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 3 August 2022

“American far-right politician” meanwhile AOC, Ilhan Omar are not stated as far left. It’s so obvious that there’s bias, why can’t u guys just be real and stop pretending there isnt. It should say he is a right-wing politician who is the Republican nominee for governor. 71.244.148.209 (talk) 03:04, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: see WP:RS and WP:NPOV Cannolis (talk) 06:49, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Agreed. This is no longer a site to rely on for unbiased and accurate information. Another once "good idea" that has become poisoned by "far-left" political partisanship. Which is why we no longer donate when the request goes out. 69.250.119.105 (talk) 05:46, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

The article is so biased it is a farce.

"Far right" politician, "disproven conspiracy theory" that the 2020 Presidential election was rigged, and-so-on. Wikipedia was intended to be a neutral place - but now it just pushes agitprop. 2A02:C7C:E183:AC00:C070:5697:3455:A836 (talk) 03:13, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

NPOV doesn't mean an article can't contain unflattering facts. --Steve Foerster (talk) 13:51, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Agreed. It's obnoxiously obvious. What a shame to see this website spiral into another leftest propaganda dumpster fire. 69.250.119.105 (talk) 05:49, 19 August 2025 (UTC)