Talk:DMG Media
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the DMG Media article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Image copyright problem with Image:Newteletextlogo2007.PNG
[edit]
The image Image:Newteletextlogo2007.PNG is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:12, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Harmsworth Quays move
[edit]DMG Group's printing operations were meant to move some time in 2013 from Rotherhithe in Docklands to Thurrock, Essex. Anyone know if that's happened yet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.36.38.240 (talk) 08:17, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Capitalisation of title
[edit]I have again moved the page to from dmg media to DMG Media per MOS:TM, which is quite clear and established on this point. If a move to dmg media is still desired, we can run it through the move process at WP:RM, but I didn't want to start there because it is backlogged and this case is so clearly indicated by past decisions.
Likewise, per MOS:TM, I have corrected the capitalisation in the text. ENeville (talk) 16:18, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- I have again corrected capitalisation per MOS:TM, after asking ClaudiaGoss to please address their reversion of same but hearing no response. ENeville (talk) 05:54, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- The company's own website dmgmedia.co.uk/about-us and its press releases spells it "dmg media" with lower case letters. So does its corporate logo: dmgmedia.co.uk/images/dmg-media-logo.png. MOS:TM says: Using all lowercase letters may likewise be acceptable if it is done universally by sources, such as with xkcd. I'm not going to change anything here, but "DMG Media" seems to be grossly wrong and a rebranding, like revising eBay to Ebay or iPhone to Iphone. 5Q5 (talk) 15:33, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
- Lower case proof: "Corporate Identity Guidelines, June 2014" dmgmedia.co.uk/uploads/files/dmg-media-guidelines-booklet-June-14.pdf. I think a move is in order if someone wants to do that. 5Q5 (talk) 15:46, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
- No, if we followed every company's "identity guidelines", then we would have to just throw out MOS:TM. The two are incompatible. We don't follow how a business brands, promotes, or markets itself – we follow how it is named in independent third-party news and books about the business. For example, DailyMail.Com publisher acquires Elite Daily: "
DMG Media, the global media brand which owns DailyMail.com, today announced that it has acquired US-based news website Elite Daily.
" When writing a news item about its own business, the company properly uses upper case for the acronym. This is what MOS:TM looks for and follows. Another example – Wbm1058 (talk) 21:50, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- No, if we followed every company's "identity guidelines", then we would have to just throw out MOS:TM. The two are incompatible. We don't follow how a business brands, promotes, or markets itself – we follow how it is named in independent third-party news and books about the business. For example, DailyMail.Com publisher acquires Elite Daily: "
- Lower case proof: "Corporate Identity Guidelines, June 2014" dmgmedia.co.uk/uploads/files/dmg-media-guidelines-booklet-June-14.pdf. I think a move is in order if someone wants to do that. 5Q5 (talk) 15:46, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Who wrote this?
[edit]This is a bit self-serving, don't you think: "Established in 1896, the brand is as influential as ever and is an integral part of British journalism." How do you flag something for neutral point of view? 80.0.73.109 (talk) 14:57, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- I don't know but I've removed it. Thanks Gabriel Yuji (talk) 20:18, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
"Extra.ie" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Extra.ie. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. The Banner talk 14:08, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
"Richard Caccappolo" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Richard Caccappolo has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 November 16 § Richard Caccappolo until a consensus is reached. Thepharoah17 (talk) 09:28, 21 November 2025 (UTC)