Talk:Cyberpanel

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because this product is available on many mainstream VPS hosting sites and it is in the news for its security issues. See the sources. I'm very surprised this is nominated for speedy deletion. I specifically included links to news articles for this reason. --Rj.amdphreak (talk) 22:35, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

@Rj.amdphreak I have declined the request to delete this under A7, but I have concerns about this remaining in mainspace as written. Parts of it read like an advertisement, and the parts that refer to the reader as "you" and the warnings are not written in a tone that is appropriate for an encyclopedia, rather than a how to guide. I'll see if I can edit it to fix it; but if not I may end up moving it to draft space. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 20:26, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

I don't see how they read like an advertisement, considering I don't like the company. They read as a bare minimum understanding of what the software does and why not to use it. Perception of any amount of "advertising" sentiment is purely coincidental. Rj.amdphreak (talk) 05:12, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

I don't know why you mark paragraph 1 as citation needed. The description of what it does is all within the [1] citation in the first sentence. There is no need to be repetitive about citations. If someone is looking for a way to verify, they'll click on [1] to go directly to the product's website. I even provided wayback links, if I recall correctly, to make sure that info doesn't go invalid. Rj.amdphreak (talk) 05:16, 20 June 2026 (UTC)