Talk:Contralateral brain

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 28 September 2017 by reviewer SwisterTwister (talk · contribs).

Biology Low‑importance

	Biology portal Contralateral brain is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neuroscience Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has not yet been associated with a particular area.

The "Theories" section seems to mostly be written in support of this publication: https://peerj.com/articles/7096/ —Is the Wikipedia article biased or being used to strengthen the publication linked? ( rcbarnes, 21:13, 11 April 2022 (UTC) ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rcbarnes (talk • contribs)

Surely, this should not be the impression. Indeed, there is very little scientific literature on theories, given that the contralateral organization of the brain is such a well-known phenomenon. Possibly the opening paragraph of the "Theories" section should be made less concise (i.e. listing earlier proposals more explicitly) and the reference to https://peerj.com/articles/7096/ removed (it is cited again later). Is that what you mean? Marci68 (talk) 06:27, 14 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Many thanks for the comment: I now revised the introduction to the Contralateral brain#Theories section! Marci68 (talk) 20:06, 15 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

A page that knows where it met you.