Talk:Computer science
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Computer science article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
| Informatics Practices was merged into this article on 7 October 2018. The discussion was closed on 9 September 2018 with a consensus to merge. The original page is now a redirect to this article. Its history now serves to provide attribution for the content in this article, and it must not be deleted as long as this article exists. |
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| Text or other creative content from this version of Computer science was copied or moved into Computer science education with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Should the CS article be bumped up to Level 2 in vitality?
[edit]The computer science article is one of the most important, if not the most important article relating to computer science - since it literally is about computer science. I think it should be bumped up to atleast Level 2 for now since there is still some things we have to include into the article such as references. Vivaidris (talk) 19:58, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
- Late reply - Agreed that it should be Level 2 vital, but on inspection, I'm not actually sure how to do that. I checked the diff with Talk:Computer, which is Level 2 vital. AFAICT the talk source code seems similar, both have :WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=, maybe there is some other way to bump things to Level 2/1? Caleb Stanford (talk) 03:45, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
- Looks like there is some information about this here. Caleb Stanford (talk) 03:47, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
- OK so on looking into this further - I'm actually not convinced this should be Level 2 vital. Level 3 is already quite high up in the food chain, so to speak. If you check Level 2, in order to propose, one also needs to bump down one of the existing articles. Currently, assuming we bump down something from technology (any other category is a bit dubious), this means we would have to bump down one of: Computer, Engineering, Tool, or Transport.
- That seems fairly absurd for any of those 4. The only one for which there is sort of an argument is Computer, but for that, it's not clear why Computer Science is more important than Computer, or which is more foundational between the two.
- Seems like Level 3 is correct. Caleb Stanford (talk) 04:00, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
The redirect Draft:Yugoslavic Cartesian Bitmapping has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 July 15 § Draft:Yugoslavic Cartesian Bitmapping until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 22:42, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
Image of woman
[edit]Hello. May God guide us above goodness
I have a valuable suggestion, please remove the painted images of women in the history section, because I'm afraid it includes exposing women's private parts or aurat in Islam. Please do it because it is mandatory even for non-Muslims. Hopefully this is useful, barakallahu fiik ~2026-49169-50 (talk) 07:09, 11 September 2026 (UTC)
- The image of [[[Ada Lovelace]] is WP:PERTINENT and should not be removed. ~Kvng (talk) 15:22, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
Misleading Image
[edit]Under the box "Fundamental areas of computer science" (top right), there is a circuit diagram with caption "Computer Architecture". This image is a circuit diagram, not of an architecture. I think this is misleading. Should this be updated? ~2026-50569-87 (talk) 04:02, 19 September 2026 (UTC)