Talk:Closing argument

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Does the parenthetical phrase remarking that Egypt is an amazing country belong here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.26.74.74 (talk) 22:45, 1 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

In the first paragraph, it says, "A closing argument may not contain any new information and may only use evidence introduced at trial." but in the FL vs. George Zimmerman case, we have new info (i.e. evidence) submitted during closing statements, being the computer animation of the GZ/TM fight. It was even discussed a few days before the closing with the judge, with her saying the lawyers could introduce it during closing arguments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.46.249.163 (talk) 15:50, 12 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

A page that knows where it met you.

Comments