Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a28ce50c49bb3cd0

Jump to content

Talk:Citigroup Center/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Epicgenius in topic GA Review

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:29, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:29, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Basic stuff and comments

[edit]
  • "Each facade segments" → "Each facade segment"
  • Add a hyphen between "energy saving".
  • Hyphen between "silver colored".
  • Remove the comma after "finalized in 1973".
  • [115]The → [115] The
  • Remove the comma after "standard elevators".
  • "made a decision" → "decided"
  • "space in the building rented" → "space in the building was rented"
  • Remove the comma after "$2.32 billion".
  • Remove the comma after "architectural success".
  • Check for citation ordering issues.
  • Wall Street JournalThe Wall Street Journal
  • Mark references from The New York Times with "|url-access=limited".
  • Mark references from The Real Deal New York with "|url-access=subscription".
  • Wikilink Paul Goldberger, Grace Glueck, David W. Dunlap, and Ada Louise Huxtable.

Progress

[edit]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·
Thanks. I've done all of these. Epicgenius (talk) 22:23, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.