Talk:Churchill Forge Mill

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mills Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mills, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mills on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MillsWikipedia:WikiProject MillsTemplate:WikiProject MillsMills
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Worcestershire Low‑importance

	Worcestershire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Worcestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Worcestershire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WorcestershireWikipedia:WikiProject WorcestershireTemplate:WikiProject WorcestershireWorcestershire
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merging

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article is probably never going to be more than a stub. I am suggesting it be merged with the village of Churchill, Worcestershire, as a feature/landmark of that village. --Kudpung (talk) 12:06, 10 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Oppose It's a valid stub and should remain as an article supported by the Mills WikiProject Mjroots (talk)
- Oppose Now it is larger, so I have rated it class=start.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 01:24, 2 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The previous disgraceful article was no more than tourist publicity. The article has been revised to fulfil encyclopaedic standards. Sweetpool50 (talk) 10:32, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply