Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a46d210b0aca1ae0

Jump to content

Talk:Charles Ingram

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 months ago by DanielRigal in topic Who Wants to Be a Millionaire Cheat?

Belteshazzar long-term sock-puppetry

[edit]

This article has been a long-term target of Belteshazzar's sock-puppets who is now using proxy IPs , to evade their block. The article might have to be semi-protected if this behaviour continues. Psychologist Guy (talk) 11:16, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Does he think Ingram was innocent? Surprisingly, that edit appears factually accurate. I had thought Ingram did U-turns on nearly every question on the second night, but watching the footage, it was only those three. 212.68.34.182 (talk) 01:20, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
212.68.34.182 above was Belteshazzar and the account has been blocked as a proxy. He's now editing the article on this IP Psychologist Guy (talk) 01:28, 10 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Date Ingram was promoted to Major?

[edit]

I'm not going to argue with the sockpuppeteer about this but if anybody else wants to take a look at which year Ingram became a Major and make any corrections required then please go ahead. Please do not be discouraged by the number of recent reversions. If a legitimate change is made by anybody who is not engaged in sockpuppetry then it will not be reverted. DanielRigal (talk) 16:29, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Article does not appear to be objective.

[edit]

I have no connection with this article, I just thought it appeared to lack objectivity. Melba1 (talk) 11:08, 1 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Who Wants to Be a Millionaire Cheat?

[edit]

Charles Ingram's Cought back in 2001 ~2026-34873-47 (talk) 09:43, 18 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Not done. It is not clear what change you are proposing to the article. As far as I can tell, this seems to be about the cheating scandal. If so, that is already covered extensively in the article. DanielRigal (talk) 10:23, 18 June 2026 (UTC)Reply