Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a28eb326be35addf

Jump to content

Talk:Castilian War

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 months ago by Mikeblas in topic missing citation
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Castilian War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:28, 16 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Source #9: 1620, not 1578

[edit]

The source accompanying note 9 is a letter from 1620 talking about the events of that year, forty-two years after the war in question ended. Tulesounds (talk) 23:27, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

About the Castilian War page

[edit]

Hi. So, I've read Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Icons - Wikipedia, so far, the only issue was the over-use, because the use of flag icons in the infoboxes of military conflicts were said to have been exempted from the "avoid flag icons in infoboxes" rule. would it be okay for you if the flags were to be added back with a different format? or would you like to clarify what exactly was wrong? thank you. Delirium333 (talk) 14:05, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Is it exempted, I've never seen this (not saying its wrong). I'll leave it for another editor to judge, probably best if someone else besides me only checks this. Danial Bass (talk) 14:19, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi I am referring to MOS:INFOBOXFLAG. In it, it says "Generally, flag icons should not be used in infoboxes, even when there is a "country", "nationality" or equivalent field: they could be unnecessarily distracting and might give undue prominence to one field among many." Danial Bass (talk) 14:17, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Strength of Brunei

[edit]

Okay, somebody deleted the two units used in the War. For the 62 cannons, it has a reference ALREADY. the 50 Ships and Galley can be found in the Military of the Bruneian Sultanate (1368 - 1888) at the Decline section. So if you want to delete it again. check their respective articles. (62 Cannons can also be mentioned in Battle of Kota Batu (1578)). Syazwi Irfan (talk) 05:47, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

missing citation

[edit]

Hello Syazwi Irfan! In this edit you added a footnote for "Tomé Pires 1515". But there's no such citation in the article. This makes it hard to verify the material you've added, and causes the article to show an error. Are you able to provide the missing citation so that the material can be checked and the erorr cleaned up? -- mikeblas (talk) 01:28, 5 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Just remove it since there is already like two others but I don't know honestly... I don't mind if you delete it it's somewhat useless since there is like two already. Syazwi Irfan (talk) 03:12, 5 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
I removed it for you -- but can't help but wonder why you didn't do so yourself. -- mikeblas (talk) 16:31, 28 September 2025 (UTC)Reply