Talk:Caroline Stuart, Countess of Seafield

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage (assessed as Low-importance).

Women's History

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Scotland

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

MOS

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The style of this article is problematic, to say the least. It is not the only one; the 6th, 7th and 8th Earl's articles are (or were, having been tidied) similarly formatted. Biographies should be linear, recording someone's life in chapters (i.e. 'early life', 'career', 'death', etc.). This and the other articles are written so oddly, that not only are they difficult/boring to read, but hard to understand. A miscellany of assessments is not bad or wrong but should go orderly at the end of the article. I am attempting to fix this without removing all of the acquired sources/quotes. Fitzkarl (talk) 17:43, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

NOTE: this revision is what I refer to Fitzkarl (talk) 17:49, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

A page that knows where it met you.

MOS