Talk:Canis Minor/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 09:59, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

---

• "and it is commonly represented as one of the dogs following the constellation of Orion the hunter." - so there are more than two dogs?
• "In Bayer's Uranometria, Procyon on the dog's belly, and Gomeisa its neck.[10]" - uhmm...
• "however his star 12 Canis Minoris was not found not to exist.[9]" - sounds better and is more logical. Perhaps add "to date" at the end.
• See also a colourful, large table and a very small lead. Not sure we need the hatnote linking to Canis Minor (Chinese astronomy).--Tomcat (7) 12:17, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

ok, did the first three and buffed the lead. Not sure what you meant about the table...all the constellation articles have those infoboxes at the bottom.....? Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:53, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

I was referring to the Canis Minor (Chinese astronomy) article. Regards.--Tomcat (7) 20:04, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

aah ok. Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:03, 19 October 2012 (UTC)