Talk:CSS HTML Validator
Add topicLatest comment: 11 years ago by Guy Macon in topic It's a description of a product which, as a licensed user, in my view is best in it's class
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 20 March 2015 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Reads like an advertisement
[edit]The only contributor to the page is the software author. Entry looks biased and like a product ad.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.247.184.203 (talk • contribs) 08:39, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
It's a description of a product which, as a licensed user, in my view is best in it's class
[edit]I have seen the product referenced in Dummies Guides and other books on Web Design where the authors saw fit to recommend it as a product that helped the user create better websites. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.62.155.53 (talk) 00:10, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- I am sure that it is a fine product. If it wasn't, the internet would have multiple "CSE HTML Validator sucks" comments. That's one sign of a bad product, and nobody seems to be complaining about this one. Alas, being a fine product is not enough to justify a Wikipedia article. Wikipedia articles need to meet the requirements found in WP:GNG, and this one doesn't. --Guy Macon (talk) 00:39, 23 March 2015 (UTC)