Talk:Busbridge

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Busbridge article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Surrey Mid‑importance

	Surrey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWikipedia:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hydestile

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hydestile isn't a linear settlement. 31.52.254.82 (talk) 22:40, 17 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Splitting proposal

Latest comment: 5 months ago4 comments2 people in discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to split Murgatroyd49 (talk) 10:15, 21 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

I propose that the section about Tuesley be split into a separate page called Tuesley. The content of the section is now only marginally related to the main article, and this section is large and well-sourced enough to make its own page. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 15:49, 14 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Support a settlement in the Domesday Book probably passes WP:GEOLAND. Also note that the parish it's in is now called Munstead and Tuesley and it doesn't include Busbridge so like Scotforth (parish) so the info for Tuesley doesn't belong in this article anyway. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:06, 15 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Assuming no objections I will also split out the sections related to Munstead on the same grounds.Murgatroyd49 (talk) 10:51, 17 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A page that knows where it met you.

Hydestile

Splitting proposal