Talk:Bruce Codex

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religious texts (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts

Languages

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm a little confused about what languages this Bruce Codex was actually written in. MacDermot does indeed describe it as containing Coptic, Arabic, and Ethiopic manuscripts (Introduction, p. ix), but her full description of its contents – "two manuscripts and some fragments" (p. xi) with the fragments treated as part of the first MS – leaves no room for anything but Coptic material. The Bodleian catalogue also classifies it only as "Coptic." The Bruce collection seems to include other independent manuscripts in Ethiopic and Arabic. Perhaps this is what she was meant to write? Unless someone has another theory, I think I'll remove the mentions of Arabic and Ethiopic in the article. Lusanaherandraton (talk) 04:13, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

A page that knows where it met you.

Languages