Talk:Blitz-class aviso

Blitz-class aviso has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Blitz-class aviso is part of the Avisos of Germany series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 24, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed
January 28, 2021	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Military history: Maritime / European / German

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Latest comment: 13 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Blitz-class aviso/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dank (talk · contribs) 20:12, 22 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Review:

"ships of any time": ships of any kind? - Dank (push to talk) 20:12, 22 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
- Yup. Wonder what I was thinking of when I wrote that. Parsecboy (talk) 16:30, 24 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
"While serving as a torpedo boat flotilla leader": I'd prefer "When serving as torpedo boat flotilla leaders" or "When leading torpedo boat flotillas"
- Fixed.
"speed this": this speed
- Apparently I'm dyslexic periodically.
"The ships were also equipped with four 8.7 cm K L/23 guns in single mounts. They also carried one 35 cm (14 in) torpedo tube mounted in the bow.": The ships were also equipped with four 8.7 cm K L/23 guns in single mounts and one 35 cm (14 in) torpedo tube mounted in the bow.
- Done.
"In 1891–1892": I'm fighting a losing battle here, but I think some readers are going to wonder what this means, if not "In 1891 and 1892". - Dank (push to talk) 20:23, 22 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
- Sounds fine to me.
Otherwise:

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
- Dank (push to talk) 21:56, 22 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for reviewing the article, Dan. Parsecboy (talk) 16:30, 24 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Passed. - Dank (push to talk) 23:40, 24 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

A page that knows where it met you.

GA Review