Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2ab99721df070b8

Jump to content

Talk:Blackstone Inc.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleBlackstone Inc. was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 27, 2009Good article nomineeListed
February 12, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Suggested source: Glasswing Translator analysis of May 4 Blackstone JV

[edit]

I'd like to propose a primary-source citation candidate for editor review. The May 4, 2026 Anthropic-Blackstone-Hellman & Friedman-Goldman Sachs joint venture is currently underrepresented in this article's coverage of Blackstone's strategic partnerships.

A 3,800-word doctrinal analysis was published May 5, 2026, that paraphrases primary coverage (Blackstone press release, WSJ, Fortune, TechCrunch, Reuters) and may be useful as a secondary source for the JV section:

  • Johnson, Dee Jared. "The Forward-Deployed Prediction Error: What the
 Anthropic-Blackstone JV Doesn't Say." The Glasswing Translator, Issue 001,
 Cognitive Fusion Framework, May 5, 2026.
 https://www.cognitivefusion.systems/insights/glasswing-001.html

The piece quotes a notable line from the Blackstone press release ("Claude's capabilities change on a monthly or even weekly basis") that may warrant inclusion in the article body.

Disclosure: I am the author of the cited piece and an interested party. Per WP:COI, I am proposing this on Talk only and will not edit the article directly. Editors are welcome to evaluate the source against WP:RS standards and decide whether and how to incorporate it. DJohnsonSLC (talk) 17:32, 15 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

This appears to be WP:SPS, and is therefor not a reliable source. Please do not spam suggestions to multiple talk pages in this way. Grayfell (talk) 23:15, 27 May 2026 (UTC)Reply