Talk:Biloxi language

Indigenous peoples of North America Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Languages

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Louisiana Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Louisiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana (assessed as Low-importance).

Comment

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

1. You should tell a bit more about the livelihood of the speakers of this language.

2. It needs to be explained why the grammar you are using was written several dozen years after the last native speaker had died. You should address the sources available on this language in general.

3. If possible, you could say some words about the classification of the language. G Purevdorj (talk) 21:33, 18 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Okay. I'll add this info to the article. To make things clear, the reason I'm using Einaudi is because she is basing her analysis on a number of different sources (Dorsey, Matthews, Haas) who my impression is all only give part of the big picture and have their own inconsistencies. Mo-Al (talk) 20:31, 22 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

A page that knows where it met you.

Comment