Talk:Bicycle counter

Cycling Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Transport Low‑importance

	Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I added a section on criticism of the counters to avoid that it sounds like an advertisement. Somebody with any other issues that make it sound like an advertisement? (Schlawensko, 27.04.2020). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schlawensko (talk • contribs) 14:45, 27 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Counters vs Barometers

Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There seem to be two conceptually separate topics being combined here. The first is a straightforward and discrete counting of cyclists which fits into a general transport planning / traffic engineering paradigm. The second is the use of public displays at count locations (aka "barometers", apparently) as a more political means of advocating for cyclists, fighting motonormativity, etc. I'm not sure whether it would be better to separate the concepts into separate wiki pages or to better parse the distinction here. Nate Wessel (talk) 15:27, 30 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

A page that knows where it met you.

Counters vs Barometers