Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2a9afd19c453337

Jump to content

Talk:Bhavashankari

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Gnomingstuff in topic Likely AI-generated text

15 August 2010

[edit]

Before doing any arbitrary modification, discuss here. BengaliHindu (talk) 06:40, 15 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Pendo [ পেঁড়ো ] and Basantapur are different. Pendo and Basantapur are now two distinct villages, separated from one another by few kilometers. The area covered by the Pendo fort lies entirely within the Pendo village and is somewhat distinctly marked as Pendo Garh [ পেঁড়ো (গড়) ]. A portion of the surrounding moat still exists. The area covered by the fort is circular, having a diameter of half a kilometer. The locality to the north of the fort is called Chaudhuridanga, the paternal of residence of Bhavashankari. BengaliHindu (talk) 07:25, 15 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Rajvallabhi and Jayadurga are different deities. Rajvallabhi was the patron deity of the kingdom. She was worshipped by every subject of the kingdom. Her temple is still there at Rajbalhat. On the other hand, Jayadurga was a kuladevata. She was worshipped by members of the royal family only. Her statue is still worshipped in a temple within the Pendo village. BengaliHindu (talk) 18:05, 15 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Pendo, Howrah and Pandua, Hooghly are different places. BengaliHindu (talk) 18:07, 15 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Issues

[edit]

The article has several issues. Among these are that there are no dates; there should be dates, especially in the intro, in a historical article. There are many PoV statements. Imc (talk) 21:30, 27 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Raybaghini Bhabashankari.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Raybaghini Bhabashankari.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 9 February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:31, 10 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bhavashankari. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:26, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Likely AI-generated text

[edit]

Concerns were raised previously via tag about AI-generated content in this article, which is prohibited per WP:NOLLM. This is a procedural talk page section to discuss it. There is no need to ping me in response. Read WP:AISIGNS for more information for why this is tagged; however, note that fixing the issue requires more than just changing the superficial signs.

The edit this pertains to: Special:Diff/1274611970 Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:46, 2 July 2026 (UTC)Reply