Talk:Behind the Exclusive Brethren
Add topicLatest comment: 6 months ago by ScytodesReticulata in topic Sect name change
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Behind the Exclusive Brethren article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
.svg){kind=small} | This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (centre, colour, realise, program, travelled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | Behind the Exclusive Brethren has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 1, 2009. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the author of Behind the Exclusive Brethren decided to research the Australian religious group after discovering its close access to Prime Minister John Howard? | |||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Behind the Exclusive Brethren/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: maclean (talk) 07:04, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Good article review (see Wikipedia:What is a good article? for criteria)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- Notes
- File:Behind the Exclusive Brethren.jpg - this is a non-free image. However, it is much larger than it needs to be (it is currently 901 × 1,365 pixels or 143 KB), so it should be reduced in size (low resolution). I have reduced its size to 30 KB maclean (talk) 03:25, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Sect name change
[edit]I updated reference to Exclusive Brethren to Plymouth Brethren Christian Church to reflect the current name of the group
Categories:
- Wikipedia articles that use Australian English
- Wikipedia good articles
- Language and literature good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles
- GA-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- GA-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- GA-Class Book articles
- WikiProject Books articles