Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a27b24c35c13bd4a

Jump to content

Talk:Bassetki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Ploversegg in topic Merger proposal

Merger proposal

[edit]
  • Weak oppose Site and village share a name, but they're not the same. I would just move all the archaeology stuff to Mardaman and either mention its existence in the text of the village, or put the site in a See also section. Articles that try to merge information about an archaeological site and a modern settlement tend to become messy so in my opinion it's better to keep them separated. Best, Zoeperkoe (talk) 06:37, 28 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
    Reasonable. I was motivated after watching the OI video on the Bassketi excavations and noticed that these two articles had a lot of overlap, but yeah, just maybe moving some stuff between them makes more sense.Ploversegg (talk) 14:49, 28 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. Our normal practice is to maintain separate articles on archaeological sites and the modern places they're in or near to, since sources rarely address them together and the content of the articles tends to be structured very differently. Joe (talk) 10:19, 12 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Well then, I will rm the merger prop and maybe move a few things bet the articles.Ploversegg (talk) 15:18, 12 November 2021 (UTC)Reply