Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2786f93df33f4e0

Jump to content

Talk:Animal Liberation Front

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 days ago by ~2026-40453-21 in topic Website link
Former good article nomineeAnimal Liberation Front was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 27, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed


Terrorist Group

[edit]

They have been cited as a Terrorist group along with the ELF for the over $110 million of damages, threats, intimidation, instructions on bomb making being made publicly available. Link: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-109shrg32209/html/CHRG-109shrg32209.htm I note a large cadre of ALF apologists, constantly rewriting this page to paint this terror group in a glowing innocent light and adding in various retorts and claims of "false flag" operations, which would be laughable if this group's activities were not so serious and life endangering. Its damned shameful and no better than those who defend neo nazi groups  Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.69.56.14 (talk) 20:19, 1 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Engaging in ad hominem attacks and bad faith editing (see: WP:GF) is not a good way to build a case for your preferred version of the article, and ridiculous comparisons to neo-Nazis probably won't help, either.--C.J. Griffin (talk) 20:46, 1 December 2021 (UTC)Reply


Nah you are absolutely wrong. ALF is fully justified in all its actions RJS001 (talk) 14:32, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

FBI source

[edit]

File:Domestic Terrorism Symbols Guide Part 01.pdf is not a useful addition to the article, especially as it was included in this edit. We could reasonably summarize the content it has on ALF and include it as a reference, but we would need to be careful about using straightforward statements that hew to the primary source.

As it is, the image displayed is entirely unhelpful, and it's not accurate to say (as the caption currently does), that the FBI "associates the ALF with domestic terrorism", as the document itself is heavily hedged and never makes so broad a claim. Pinging Tryptofish, who recently reverted my removal. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:00, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Not a big deal to me, so I self-reverted. --Tryptofish (talk) 19:05, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Shouldn't we mention that at least one of these firebombings was actually an undercover cop

[edit]

Seems relevant. 2604:3D09:D78:1000:7CB2:BC52:EF01:E8DD (talk) 03:30, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

We would need a source (reference). --Tryptofish (talk) 22:40, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

The website link appears to go to a book publisher from the 2010s instead of the ALF. Is this intended? ~2026-42369-55 (talk) 22:21, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

I looked at it, and it looks like somebody publishing stuff that comes from ALF. I don't know if there is any way to tell whether it is "official". --Tryptofish (talk) 00:17, 30 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
I think removal would be the best thing, especially considering that theres no central organisation of the ALF to have a website. ~2026-40453-21 (talk) 17:45, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply