Talk:Alma Howard

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 16 December 2016 by reviewer KGirlTrucker81 (talk · contribs).

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Women scientists Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Importance

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Being bold and assigning this as top importance on the grounds that she made a fundamental discovery creating a new field. She edited the major international journal in her field and while she might not have achieved household-name status, she was a woman scientist working basically outside the university system who happened to publish at the same time as probably the most fundamental biomedical paper of the 20th century. I've looked at other top rated Women Scientists in the project and it does not seem to be completely out of line. Other editors from the Women scientists project might be able to bring any further consideration to bear. JBVaughan (talk) 03:02, 17 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

A page that knows where it met you.

Importance