Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25a4e4bdee81210

Jump to content

Talk:Algebraic connectivity

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by LachlanA in topic Non-negative edges

Values of the algebraic connectivity in actual networks

[edit]

FWIW, here's a table of values for the algebraic connectivity for lots of real networks: http://konect.uni-koblenz.de/statistics/alconJérôme (talk) 08:16, 23 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Bounds for algebraic connectivity

[edit]

I am slightly confused by the sentence 'Furthermore, the value of the algebraic connectivity is bounded above by the traditional (vertex) connectivity of the graph'. It purports to be from [1] but I can find no such statement on that page. Slight testing in Mathematica reveals it to be false for complete graphs (where vertex connectivity = n - 1, algebraic connectivity = n). Any thoughts? Erik (talk) 08:47, 22 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. J.L. Gross and J. Yellen. Handbook of Graph Theory, CRC Press, 2004, page 314

Non-negative edges

[edit]

The article says "The algebraic connectivity of undirected graphs with nonnegative weights is , with the inequality being strict if and only if G is connected." I believe "nonnegative" should be "positive". If zero-weight edges are allowed, then a connected graph (even a clique) can have a zero connectivity matrix, and hence . LachlanA (talk) LachlanA (talk) 04:47, 8 June 2025 (UTC)Reply