Talk:Alexis Goldstein
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 5 months ago by Ipigott in topic Notability tag?
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Notability tag?
[edit]Hi @Ipigott, could you provide some more context why you put up the notability tag? I would say that the number of featured articles and media appearances over more than a decade on American financial regulation policy makes her notable. She has testified to both the Senate and to Congress on this topic, which to me establishes credibility and recognized expertise. Her message has still been able to break through to more mainstream appearances like the Daily Show. Even before her run for political office I would argue she was a notable figure. Edittttor (talk) 16:43, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- I've checked the sources more carefully and agree she is sufficiently notable.--Ipigott (talk) 09:53, 21 February 2026 (UTC)