Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2997a765850a23e

Jump to content

Talk:Alexey Davydov

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 00:31, 20 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Created by JJonahJackalope (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 61 past nominations.

JJonahJackalope (talk) 14:55, 10 January 2025 (UTC).Reply

  • Everything in the article appears to be sourced, hook appears and is sourced in the article (will verify shortly), no copyvio concerns, QPQ done. The hook, however, is too long. In a character counter, it appears as 234 characters long, and can't be over 200. Writing a more concise hook shouldn't be too big of an issue, though. Departure– (talk) 19:03, 13 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Departure–:, thank you for initiating this review. I just ran the hook through a character counter and it says that there are only 198 characters, which is also what the DYK submission template said when I created this hook. I believe the issue is that, when all of the markups are included, such as the double apostrophes and brackets and such, it is 234 characters. However, per the DYK rules, "The hook cannot exceed 200 prose characters", and under those guidelines, I believe my hook, while nearing the limit, is still short enough to qualify. Thanks, -JJonahJackalope (talk) 19:15, 13 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
@JJonahJackalope: aside from that, which isn't an issue after all, the article is alright for DYK. Hook verifies. Good to go! Departure– (talk) 21:24, 13 January 2025 (UTC)Reply