Talk:Alex Rosen
Add topicThe contentious topics procedure applies to this article. The entire article relates to the following contentious topics:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Feedback from New Page Review process
[edit]I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!
On the latest edit
[edit]@LilianaUwU. Hi, I believe the edit I recently made did not violate any part of the neutral point of view guideline, since it just restated what the Courier & Press and AOL had already said about the person in question. All the claims about this man's positions were backed up with sources, and sometimes even by his own statements as described in said sources. Can you review the two sources I added and, if possible, restore my edit? Badbluebus (talk) 20:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- I double checked and those edits seem reasonable, though I take issue with "criticism of the LGBT community". I have my issues with the LGBT community sometimes, but the statements Rosen have said seem to be closer to homophobia than mere criticism. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 20:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, his comments were beyond just criticism, but the sources for that statement had the text "He's drawn ire for having used a racial slur and criticizing LGBTQ people", so I felt that defaulting to the word "criticism" on the page would be better. Badbluebus (talk) 20:34, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:BLPBALANCE
[edit]This article seems to very disproportionately list his wrongdoings in a way that violates WP:BLPBALANCE. Not only is most of the "Career" section just a thinly-veiled attack on the subject, but the section on politics takes up half of the article. Is there a way to edit this in a manner that is more WP:NPOV? Katzrockso (talk) 06:42, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
- lol, no, it can't be done because this is a politically sensitive article and wikipedia is hopelessly captured by ideologues who are IN FAVOR of this pedophilia. Alex stands against them, so he is an enemy. Let that sink in. But seriously, abandon wikipedia, there is no chance of a fair and balanced article, it is not possible. Not until there is dramatic overhaul of this entire site, which isn't going to happen, so yeah, it is just a fool's errand to get upset about the bias: there's nothing you or me can do about it that won't be automatically undone. ~2025-32256-00 (talk) 20:55, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia pages about a contentious topic mislabelled as protected
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Skepticism articles
- Low-importance Skepticism articles
- WikiProject Skepticism articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles