Talk:Agentic commerce

COI edit request: Stripe Sessions MPP example

COI disclosure: I am connected with PostalForm, so I am not editing the article directly.

Would an uninvolved editor consider whether a short, neutral mention belongs in the payments/technical infrastructure discussion? Suggested wording, if it is due weight:

At Stripe Sessions 2026, Stripe demonstrated agent-initiated payment workflows using the Machine Payments Protocol, including a flow in which an AI agent used PostalForm to mail a PDF through MPP.

Sources:

• https://stripe.com/sessions/2026/what-stripe-data-tells
• https://stripe.com/sessions/2026/indexing-the-economy

I recognize these are primary Stripe/Sessions sources, so if editors think the detail is too narrow or promotional for article space, no change is fine. I am raising it here because direct editing would be inappropriate given my COI. Gabegarrett (talk) 01:09, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

Removed maintenance templates

I did a sourcing cleanup: removed self-published/promotional material (the ACF paragraph sourced only to acfstandard.com; the Horrea consultancy mention), replaced Substack citations (Finsignals, fintechwrapup) and a low-reliability journal (IJCESEN) with the independent reliable sources already in the article (McKinsey, BCG, NMI, AFP/Asian Banker), and copyedited the Payments section. Given the coverage from McKinsey, BCG, Forbes, CNBC, AP, Axios, The Verge and EMARKETER, the notability concern appears resolved, so I removed both maintenance templates. Happy to discuss.

--Beatboxxx49 (talk) 10:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC)