Talk:AfPak
Add topic | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary definition
[edit]This article is about a word. One sentence is defining that word, the rest is about its origin, use, and reception. If you think it's not notable you could put it up for AfD, but the article isn't a dictionary definition and its content couldn't really be different. I guess if someone was ambitious they could write about the whole policy turn toward treating Afghanistan and Pakistan as a unified problem, but that's probably best covered somewhere else.Prezbo (talk) 20:46, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
This is not so much a word as a policy concept. This policy concept has a major relevance to present-day global affairs, just like the 'War on Terror' concept, which understandably has its own category as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.53.250.36 (talk) 13:32, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Please add in Bruce Riedel rebuttal of AfPak term, from CIPS Podcasts, from 2009.
[edit]Please add in Bruce Riedel rebuttal of AfPak term, from CIPS Podcasts, from 2009. In his speech The Wars in Afghanistan and Pakistan:Obama's strategy, to Centre for International Policy Studies (CIPS) podcasts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.26.197 (talk) 21:45, 23 February 2014 (UTC)