Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a46245c94c58ceb4

Jump to content

Talk:Adult animation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 months ago by Historyday01 in topic Inconsistent British and American spellings
Former good articleAdult animation was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 17, 2009Good article nomineeListed
June 25, 2017Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Merger discussion for Adult animation in countries

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Adult animation in countries—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please follow the (Discuss) link at the top of the article to participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 16:23, 29 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Inconsistent British and American spellings

[edit]

The sentences in this article use inconsistent British and American spellings. I will be nominating this article for improvement at WP:AFIN#Adult animation. I’ve already made a to-do list, and I will also be notifying the associated WikiProjects. 2600 etc (talk) 17:42, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Could you share that to-do list? In solidarity - Historyday01 (talk) 18:54, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
It’s near the top of the page. /to do 2600 etc (talk) 21:32, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Oh, I see where it says "Use a consistent variety of English on this article." Perhaps it would be best to go through section by section? In solidarity - Historyday01 (talk) 21:52, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Reply