Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a44d179eadb1addf

Jump to content

Talk:AC/DC

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleAC/DC is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Good articleAC/DC has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 26, 2009.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 17, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
September 9, 2006Good article nomineeListed
October 29, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
December 13, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
January 20, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
September 10, 2007Featured article reviewKept
September 8, 2018Featured article reviewDemoted
September 24, 2023Good article nomineeNot listed
December 29, 2023Good article nomineeListed
February 22, 2024Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 24, 2024Peer reviewNot reviewed
May 5, 2024Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
June 11, 2024Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 25, 2026Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Former featured article, current good article

Nationality, Australian vs Scottish vs Scottish Born

[edit]

Semi-protected edit request on 30 November 2025

[edit]

On the section when Bon Scott joins the band there is a George mentioned first in the page without any explanation and elaboration or further detail about who is this George. I think it is not okay. Either introduce George or remove, or correct it please. ~2025-37420-61 (talk) 10:03, 30 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

 Not done. "I don't like it" is not a reason to remove something. NotJamestack (✉️|📝) 13:28, 30 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Yes, but failing to adequately introduce new people is a reason to change something. ~2026-51379-16 (talk) 23:29, 23 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

"Back in Black" isn't the second-best selling album of all time???

[edit]

Okay, the source for Back In Black lists the song as being the second-best selling album in history.

The problem is, it's listing ESTIMATED sales!

If the table is sorted by verified copies sold, then Back in Black becomes the fourth-best selling album in history.

The sources in which the estimated sales are backing are separate from what the actual organizations in each respective countries are verifiably listing! They should be organized with verified sales first, THEN estimated sales afterwards.

Should we change the article for it to say "Their first album with Johnson, Back in Black (1980), dedicated to Scott's memory, became the fourth best-selling album of all time" ? Barcodc (talk) 13:44, 27 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

This is per reported sales. That's why it's classified as the second best-selling album of all time. — VJTHEDJ (t) 03:20, 1 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Reported or estimated? That's the central question here. I would support changing the statistic or simply removing it. ~2026-51379-16 (talk) 23:30, 23 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Reported sales. Though statistic-wise, I think we should wait until there is more input on if we change it, keep it or remove it. HorrorLover555 (talk) 04:09, 24 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 6 January 2026

[edit]

change "AC/DC are an Australian rock band" to "AC/DC is an Australian rock band" because the grammar is incorrect ~2025-40044-88 (talk) 23:20, 6 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Not done The article is written in Australian English, so it is correct to use "are" as the band is a collective. HorrorLover555 (talk) 23:44, 6 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

"Years active" infobox section edits

[edit]

There have been multiple edits in the infobox changing the band's active years to either:

  1. 1973–present (hiatus: 2016–2018), or;
  2. 1973–2016, 2018–present

I'll let you guys to come to a consensus on what we should use instead. You can pick 1 or 2. Thanks. — VJTHEDJ (t) 05:22, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply