Talk:2012 Man Booker Prize
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Modest Genius in topic Copyrighted covers?
| A news item involving 2012 Man Booker Prize was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 17 October 2012. |
| This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 19 September 2012
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. DrKay (talk) 16:13, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Man Booker Prize 2012 → 2012 Man Booker Prize –
- User:86.40.104.242 asked at this diff for Man Booker Prize 2012 to be moved to 2012 Man Booker Prize. His stated reason was "To match others in its category such as 2012 Palanca Awards", but this prize's official webpege http://www.themanbookerprize.com/prize/man-booker-prize has the '2012' at the end of the name. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:23, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- The prize's official webpege also uses "2012 Man Booker Prize". It depends where you look. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.40.107.82 (talk) 16:37, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Copyrighted covers?
[edit]Is it necessary to have the copyrighted covers of the nominated books on this page? My feeling is that it is not. Even if they are kept, they'll need individual rationales on their respective image pages for their inclusion in this list. BobAmnertiopsis∴ChatMe! 00:28, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
- They certainly seem relevant to the descriptions in the text, and serve to aid recognition. So long as they have suitable fair-use rationales, I think it's a good move. Modest Genius talk 12:34, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
