Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2942c83c99a22ce

Jump to content

Positronium negative ion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Positronium negative ion
Cartoon representation of the positronium negative ion
Identifiers
ChEBI
Related compounds
Related compounds
Positronium hydride; Dipositronium
Except where otherwise noted, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C [77 °F], 100 kPa).

The positronium negative ion () is an exotic atom composed of three elementary particles: two electrons () and one positron (). It is an unstable system due to electron-positron annihilation, with a lifetime of 479 ps.[1]

Observed for the first time in 1981,[2] it is the simplest three-body system containing both matter and antimatter and composed exclusively of leptons,[1] serving as a reference system for studying the quantum mechanical three-body problem.[3] Additionally, the production of this ion is the initial step toward generating energy-tunable positronium beams for fundamental physics research.[1][4]

History

[edit]

The existence of a bound state between two electrons and a positron was first theoretically predicted by John Archibald Wheeler in 1946. In his work Polyelectrons, he theorized the existence of exotic bound systems, including the di-positronium, observed for the first time in 2007,[5] and the positronium positive ion.[6]

Since then, numerous theoretical works on have been published, concerning its binding energy, lifetime and other characteristics.[7][8] Nevertheless, given the low production efficiency and its short lifetime, the first experimental observation was achieved only in 1981 by Allen P. Mills.[2]

In 2007 a new experimental technique achieved the first production of this ion with increased conversion efficiencies (up to 1.5%).[9][10] This approach to generate provided a positron-to- conversion efficiency significantly higher compared to the method used by Mills (less than 0.1%).[10][2]

Energy levels and annihilation

[edit]
Simplified scheme of the positronium negative ion spin configuration and distances, inspired by other works.[11]

The internal structure of presents characteristics similar to an electron weakly bound to a positronium (Ps) atom.[12][8] The expectation values for the positron-electron and electron-electron distances have been computed, obtaining 2.90 Å (- distance) and 4.52 Å (- distance).[13]

As a three-body quantum system, the Schrödinger equation for cannot be solved analytically, and some approximation methods must be applied.[14][3][15] Furthermore, the Born–Oppenheimer approximation cannot be applied, since the three bodies possess exactly the same mass.[3] Therefore, theoretical determinations of the ground state energy have been performed through precision numerical computation, yielding a value of .[11][3] The negative sign indicates that is stable against dissociation into its constituent particles. Nevertheless, it is an unstable system against annihilation.[3][1][11] This occurs, from a quantum mechanical point of view, when the wave functions of an electron and of the positron partially overlap in space. The positron can possess up or down spin orientation, without restrictions. Nevertheless, the two electrons must be in a singlet state, due to the Pauli exclusion principle.[3] As a consequence, the annihilation process may occur either with an electron that possesses the same spin orientation of the positron or with an electron with opposite spin. These two cases present different properties due to the distinct selection rules for the processes. In the first case, an odd number of gamma rays is generated (predominantly three), as it happens for ortho-positronium.[3][11] In the second case, an even number of gamma rays is generated (most probably two), as in the case of para-positronium.[8][1][11] Taking the spin-average between the theoretical decay rates[16] of ortho-Ps and para-Ps results in:[11]

The decay rate for has been theoretically computed to be ,[15] and experimentally measured at .[11] This experimental value is consistent with the theoretical prediction and corresponds to a lifetime .[11] This rate accounts for the sum of several possible decay channels, although the dominant contribution is given by the two-gamma decay.[11][15]

Production

[edit]
High-efficiency production of positronium negative ions.

The first experimental generations of employed the beam-foil method. This consists in a positron beam impinging on a thin carbon foil target. The positrons' energy is adjusted such that a fraction of them penetrates the whole target. These positrons may exit from the other side of the target and bound two electrons with a certain probability, giving rise to .[2]

More recently, an alternative way of producing was developed by the group of Yasuyuki Nagashima.[9][10][1] This method is based on increasing the electronic cloud density close to the surface of a metal from which positrons are emitted. To achieve this, an established procedure is to cover the surface of a metallic sample with a sub-monolayer of an alkali metal.[17][1][9] Upon this coverage procedure, the electron work function of the system is reduced.[17] The spontaneous emission of from a surface is governed by the quantity

where and are the positron and electron work functions respectively. If , called affinity, is negative, then the emission of occurs spontaneously. Therefore, given the strong dependence on the electron work function, reducing the latter increases the production efficiency.[1] Positrons that penetrate the sample undergo several inelastic scattering events, losing kinetic energy. A large majority of them annihilate with the conduction electrons of the metal or thermalize and subsequently annihilate. However, a fraction thermalizes inside the sample and diffuses. In some cases, the diffusion is directed toward the target surface and may be formed, with the positron binding two electrons, and emitted under the previously described conditions.[9][1]

The target is usually made of tungsten, due to its negative value for the affinity.[18][1] Indeed, the emission of from clean tungsten surfaces has been observed.[18] Different alkali metals have been used for the sub-monolayer growth and to date sodium has provided the highest efficiency and duration. Indeed, the capping layer undergoes degradation over time, leading to a reduction in the ion emission efficiency. Sodium deposition is performed in situ, following a short annealing of the tungsten target.[10][9] This heating is necessary to clean the target surface to ensure a pure and uniform sodium deposition.[9][10] This production protocol achieves conversion efficiencies of positrons into up to 1.5%.[10]

Experimental research

[edit]

The increased availability of in laboratories enabled broader experimental research involving this ion.[3][1] There are two main research fields concerning this ion: one devoted to its fundamental properties and the other focused on the production of energy-tunable neutral positronium beams.[1]

Production of positronium beams

[edit]
Schematic diagram of the production of a positronium beam via emission.

The production of represents the initial stage toward the generation of positronium beams. The direct production of neutral positronium beams is constrained by its zero net electric charge, which prevents the use of standard electromagnetic optics to achieve efficient acceleration and focusing. Consequently, current experimental setups bypass this limitation by first producing a beam, employing the high-efficiency generation method described above.[1] The subsequent step consists in removing one electron via photo-detachment. This method involves the use of a high-power laser cavity. The beam crosses the laser beam, which provides sufficient energy to remove one electron via single-photon absorption.[4][19] The photo-detachment has been performed using a 1064 nm wavelength laser.[4] To maximize the photo-detachment probability a high photon flux is required. For this reason, a pulsed regime was used, allowing for a higher light intensity compared to the continuous-wave operation.[4] Nevertheless, Monte Carlo simulations have been performed, indicating that achieving photo-detachment in continuous wave mode is feasible.[19]

Positronium beams can be used for several purposes. These include experimental tests of the CPT symmetry and of the Einstein Equivalence Principle (EEP) through positronium interferometry, as well as the study of antimatter gravity.[20][19]

QED investigation and three-body problem

[edit]

The positronium negative ion is the lightest known system composed of three elementary particles. It contains both matter and antimatter and it is composed exclusively of leptons. Therefore, its constituents, as well as the whole system, do not possess any color charge and do not interact through the strong interaction. Unlike atomic systems, such as the hydrogen negative ion (), is free from uncertainties related to the presence of hadrons. These features make the positronium negative ion a system for the study of Quantum Electrodynamics (QED), allowing for precise comparisons between theoretical predictions and experimental measurements.[3][14][1]

Given the absence of a central massive nucleus, represents a benchmark for the three-body problem. Computational techniques, such as the use of Rayleigh-Ritz variational method and of Hylleraas-type wave functions,[21][22][14] must be applied to precisely calculate the ground state energy, including its relativistic and QED energy shifts.[14]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Nagashima, Yasuyuki (December 2014). "Experiments on positronium negative ions". Physics Reports. 545 (3): 95–123. Bibcode:2014PhR...545...95N. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.07.004.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Mills, Allen P. (16 March 1981). "Observation of the Positronium Negative Ion". Physical Review Letters. 46 (11): 717–720. Bibcode:1981PhRvL..46..717M. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.46.717. ISSN 0031-9007.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Emami-Razavi, Mohsen; Darewych, Jurij W. (June 2021). "Review of experimental and theoretical research on positronium ions and molecules". The European Physical Journal D. 75 (6) 188. Bibcode:2021EPJD...75..188E. doi:10.1140/epjd/s10053-021-00187-4. ISSN 1434-6060.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Michishio, K.; Tachibana, T.; Terabe, H.; Igarashi, A.; Wada, K.; Kuga, T.; Yagishita, A.; Hyodo, T.; Nagashima, Y. (11 April 2011). "Photodetachment of Positronium Negative Ions". Physical Review Letters. 106 (15) 153401. Bibcode:2011PhRvL.106o3401M. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.153401. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 21568556.
  5. Cassidy, D. B.; Mills, A. P. (13 September 2007). "The production of molecular positronium". Nature. 449 (7159): 195–197. Bibcode:2007Natur.449..195C. doi:10.1038/nature06094. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 17851519.
  6. Wheeler, John Archibald (1946). "Polyelectrons". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 48 (3): 219–238. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1946.tb31764.x. ISSN 1749-6632.
  7. Ferrante, Gaetano (5 June 1968). "Annihilation of Positrons from Positronium Negative Ion e − e + e −". Physical Review. 170 (1): 76–80. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.170.76. ISSN 0031-899X.
  8. 1 2 3 Ore, A.; Powell, J. L. (1 June 1949). "Three-Photon Annihilation of an Electron-Positron Pair". Physical Review. 75 (11): 1696–1699. Bibcode:1949PhRv...75.1696O. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.75.1696. ISSN 0031-899X.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Nagashima, Yasuyuki; Hakodate, Toshihide; Miyamoto, Ayaka; Michishio, Koji (18 December 2008). "Efficient emission of positronium negative ions from Cs deposited W(100) surfaces". New Journal of Physics. 10 (12) 123029. Bibcode:2008NJPh...10l3029N. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/10/12/123029. ISSN 1367-2630.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Terabe, Hiroki; Michishio, Koji; Tachibana, Takayuki; Nagashima, Yasuyuki (20 January 2012). "Durable emission of positronium negative ions from Na- and K-coated W(100) surfaces". New Journal of Physics. 14 (1) 015003. Bibcode:2012NJPh...14a5003T. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/1/015003. ISSN 1367-2630.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Ceeh, Hubert; Hugenschmidt, Christoph; Schreckenbach, Klaus; Gärtner, Stefan A.; Thirolf, Peter G.; Fleischer, Svenja M.; Schwalm, Dirk (13 December 2011). "Precision measurement of the decay rate of the negative positronium ion Ps −". Physical Review A. 84 (6) 062508. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.84.062508. ISSN 1050-2947.
  12. Bressanini, Dario (23 August 2021). "Internal structure of the positronium ion P s −". Physical Review A. 104 (2) 022819. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.104.022819. ISSN 2469-9926.
  13. Frolov, Alexei M. (1 October 1999). "Bound-state properties of the positronium negative ion Ps −". Physical Review A. 60 (4): 2834–2839. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.60.2834. ISSN 1050-2947.
  14. 1 2 3 4 Drake, G W F; Grigorescu, M (28 September 2005). "Binding energy of the positronium negative ion: relativistic and QED energy shifts". Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics. 38 (18): 3377–3393. Bibcode:2005JPhB...38.3377D. doi:10.1088/0953-4075/38/18/009. ISSN 0953-4075.
  15. 1 2 3 Puchalski, Mariusz; Czarnecki, Andrzej; Karshenboim, Savely G. (2007-11-16). "Positronium-Ion Decay". Physical Review Letters. 99 (20). arXiv:0711.0008. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.203401. ISSN 0031-9007.
  16. Karshenboim, Savely G. (2004-09-20). "PRECISION STUDY OF POSITRONIUM: TESTING BOUND STATE QED THEORY". International Journal of Modern Physics A. 19 (23): 3879–3896. arXiv:hep-ph/0310099. doi:10.1142/S0217751X04020142. ISSN 0217-751X.
  17. 1 2 Kiejna, A.; Wojciechowski, K.F. (January 1981). "Work function of metals: Relation between theory and experiment". Progress in Surface Science. 11 (4): 293–338. Bibcode:1981PrSS...11..293K. doi:10.1016/0079-6816(81)90003-4.
  18. 1 2 Nagashima, Yasuyuki; Sakai, Takahiko (14 December 2006). "First observation of positronium negative ions emitted from tungsten surfaces". New Journal of Physics. 8 (12): 319. Bibcode:2006NJPh....8..319N. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/8/12/319. ISSN 1367-2630.
  19. 1 2 3 Sacerdoti, M.; Toso, V.; Vinelli, G.; Bayo, M.; Rosi, G.; Salvi, L.; Tino, G.M.; Giammarchi, M.; Ferragut, R. (February 2025). "Monte Carlo simulations towards the formation of a positronium coherent beam". Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment. 1071 170068. arXiv:2307.12894. Bibcode:2025NIMPA107170068S. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2024.170068.
  20. Vinelli, G; Castelli, F; Ferragut, R; Romé, M; Sacerdoti, M; Salvi, L; Toso, V; Giammarchi, M; Rosi, G; Tino, G M (19 October 2023). "A large-momentum-transfer matter-wave interferometer to measure the effect of gravity on positronium". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 40 (20): 205024. arXiv:2303.11798. Bibcode:2023CQGra..40t5024V. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/acf8ab. ISSN 0264-9381.
  21. Ho, Y.K. (March 1990). "Positron annihilation in positronium negative ions". Physics Letters A. 144 (4–5): 237–240. doi:10.1016/0375-9601(90)90927-G.
  22. Bhatia, A. K.; Drachman, Richard J. (1983-10-01). "New calculation of the properties of the positronium ion". Physical Review A. 28 (4): 2523–2525. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.28.2523. ISSN 0556-2791.
[edit]