Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a29f6ae12a14879c

Jump to content

Oscar Chinn case

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Oscar Chinn case (Britain v. Belgium). [1934], P.C.I.J. (Ser. A/B) No. 63 was a case of the Permanent Court of International Justice.[1]

The Belgian government granted significant subsidies to a Belgian company, UNATRA, that offered transportation services in the Belgian Congo. Mr. Chinn, a British subject who operated a fluvial transport company on the Congo River could not compete (during the Great Depression) with the subsidised UNATRA's nominal prices and Britain brought a claim against the Belgian government as a matter of diplomatic protection.[2][3]

The Court decided, based on the Convention of Saint-Germain 1919 and general principles of international law, that the Belgian Government did not violate any international legal obligations to the United Kingdom.[4]

References

[edit]
  1. Oscar Chinn Case Archived 2013-09-07 at the Wayback Machine, UN Summaries of Judgements.
  2. T. Olawale Elias, The International Court of Justice And Some Contemporary Problems. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1983 Page 306
  3. Britain v. Belgium 1934 Judgment Archived 2013-11-11 at the Wayback Machine at World Court.com
  4. Britain v. Belgium 1934 Judgment paragraph 105 Archived 2013-11-11 at the Wayback Machine at World Court.com