Draft talk:Mega Test

This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology

Statistics

This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics

Standalone notability rationale

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This draft is intended to cover the Mega Test as a standalone subject rather than as a subsection of Ronald K. Hoeflin. The test has received coverage in multiple independent or semi-independent sources, including its original publication in Omni, Roger D. Carlson's evaluation in Test Critiques, David Redvaldsen's 2020 analysis of the Mega and Titan tests, the Guinness Book of Records high-IQ listing, and Rachel Aviv's Village Voice article discussing high-range IQ testing. The article is focused on the test's development, format, use by high-IQ societies, and published psychometric criticism, rather than on Hoeflin or any individual test-taker. JarvisIQ (talk) 00:44, 27 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

A page that knows where it met you.

Standalone notability rationale