The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
PaperTempo(talk·contribs) has been paid by University of Albertaon behalf of Dr. David Wishart.
This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Databases, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DatabasesWikipedia:WikiProject DatabasesTemplate:WikiProject DatabasesDatabases
This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry
Human Metabolome Project is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology
This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
I am a paid scientific writer/editor working part-time with Dr. David Wishart at the University of Alberta and have disclosed this connection in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation Terms of Use. I have followed the advice of editors in the TeaHouse and deleted the last draft. This current draft has been written from scratch using secondary resources. I welcome independent review and suggestions for improving this draft.
Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The article’s tone is somewhat promotional and contains an introduction and conclusion section akin to a report. I would suggest this be reviewed prior to AFC submission:)
Additionally, replacing the bolded headings with section markup would improve the article. I attempted to do this on my commute but I tabbed out and my changes were lost, apologies. PBugaboo (talk) 08:15, 7 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
