Draft:The Steady State
Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,128 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 10 April 2026 by Nighfidelity (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |
Submission declined on 12 December 2025 by ChrysGalley (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by ChrysGalley 7 months ago.
|
This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.
Declined by NeoGaze 10 months ago.
|
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by S0091 13 months ago.
|
Submission declined on 15 June 2025 by Rahmatula786 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by Rahmatula786 13 months ago.
|
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
This draft is not written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:
Declined by Aydoh8 14 months ago.
|
Comment: Still not sure it could pass WP:NCORP as most of the coverage is too trivial to contribute to notability. Nighfidelity (talk) 14:27, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment: The sourcing is still problematic. The issue under WP:NORG is that we would be ideally looking for 3 reliable sources to give in depth profiles of the organisation. There is one source that seems to do this (but under a paywall), which is Intelligence Online, which is part of Indigo, but essentially a limited oversight blog site. The other sources give news of specific events but not of the organisation itself. It is appreciated that the organisation has its own reasons to stay in the shadows, but that in turn makes it difficult to meet the notability hurdle.The formatting of the article would help to make the article more encyclopedic, in terms of sections and wording. Some language seems promotional (was LLM / AI used here?) such as describing a report as a landmark. That's a minor issue, and is easily changed. ChrysGalley (talk) 18:30, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment: Subject may be notable, but its sourcing is extremely inconsistent. The issues pointed by S0091 largely remain the same. Ironically, the section with the most references have little to nothing to do with the organization itself. You should use mostly secondary sources that are substantial, independent and reliable. NeoGaze (talk) 20:57, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
Comment: Almost all the sources are what those affiliated with The Steady State have said or written which are primary sources and not independent. Also, Google Docs is not a reliable source nor are blogs (even if published by NBC, etc.) so should not be used. S0091 (talk) 16:13, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment: External links should be removed or converted to inline citations where appropriate. Greenman (talk) 08:42, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
Comment: In accordance with Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, I disclose that I have a conflict of interest regarding the subject of this article. StevenACash (talk) 13:02, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Not to be confused with the steady state systems theory, disambiguation.

The Steady State is an American advocacy organization and think tank based in Washington, D.C.[1] The organization is "composed of former U.S. national security, intelligence, and diplomatic officials. Founded in 2016, the group states its mission is to advocate for 'constitutional democracy and rule-of-law-based national security."
In October 2025, the group released an intelligence‑style assessment warning that the United States was "on a trajectory" toward competitive authoritarianism, a report covered by multiple independent news outlets. The organization describes itself as nonpartisan and counts more than 425 former officials among its members who regularly engage on key issues of national security.[2][3][4][5][6][7]
Many members have been made public, others remain concealed to protect the identities of those currently holding sensitive positions.[8] Drawn largely from retired senior officials from the intelligence, diplomatic and defense communities, including the Central Intelligence Agency, the Department of State, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, its membership initially focused on providing assistance and expertise to the newly-elected administration but in 2019, shifted its focus to active public advocacy.
In March 2020, The Steady State endorsed candidate Joe Biden for President,[9][10] as well as other candidates[11][12] for Congressional offices, and engaged in growing public advocacy. Major outlets treated the endorsements as an unusual public intervention by career national‑security professionals.[13][14] The organization is endorsing candidates in the 2026 midterm Congressional elections.[15]
In 2020, The Steady State, as amicus curiae, filed a brief with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the prosecution of former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn.[16] Steady State members appeared in events sponsored by the University of Las Vegas School of Law[17] and Harvard University.[18]
On August 9, 2025, The Steady State issued an "Open Letter" in response to widespread firing of senior FBI Officials.[19][20] On August 18, 2025, The Steady State filed an amicus curiae brief in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in support of Governor Gavin Newsom and the State of California in their challenge to President Donald Trump's domestic deployment of U.S. military forces.[21] The Steady State's report "Accelerating Authoritarian Dynamics: Assessment of Democratic Decline" was published in October 2025, warning that the U.S. is on a trajectory toward competitive authoritarianism.[22][23] The authors applied the tools used during their careers as national security analysts to diagnose domestic threats to democracy. That month the organization also spoke out on the prosecution of former government officials, including John Bolton, President Trump's national security advisor from 2018-19.[24] The Steady State's Steven Cash testified in the June 2026 the House Committee on Homeland Security Democrats hearing “Tracked and Targeted: The Unconstitutional Surveillance State.”[25]
The organization has faced criticism from conservative think tanks and commentators, calling the group a dangerous, subversive or treasonous organization. The Center for Security Policy published an article titled "The Steady State – Treason From Within," in which it accuses the group of functioning as a clandestine "network that cuts across many agencies and exercises enormous power," implying that it may wield undue influence within the intelligence community and act counter to the interests of duly elected officials.[26] One article portrays The Steady State as a partisan, anti‑Trump network of former intelligence officials whose founder allegedly promotes foreign “regime‑change” tactics and maintains government contracts while engaging in political activism.[27]
The Steady State supports broader national security awareness, including the purge of career law enforcement and national security staff and election claims by the Trump administration.[28][29]
Mission and Activities
[edit]The organization advocates for adherence to constitutional processes and fact‑based national‑security policymaking. In October 2025, the Steady State published Accelerating Authoritarian Dynamics: Assessment of Democratic Decline,[30] applying intelligence‑community analytic tradecraft to the U.S. political system. The report concluded, with "moderate to high confidence," that multiple reinforcing trends were moving the country toward competitive authoritarianism; its release and findings were reported and summarized by The Guardian.[22]
The group is endorsing Congressional candidates in the 2026 United States elections as in previous elections.[31]
In August 2025, major outlets reported on a Steady State open letter to FBI personnel, criticizing leadership changes the group argued risked undermining the FBI's institutional independence. Coverage noted the letter's claims, identified several dismissed officials referenced by the group, and framed the episode as part of ongoing debates about politicization of federal law enforcement.[19][32]
Earlier, in March 2020, the Steady State attracted attention for a letter endorsing Joe Biden and criticizing President Donald Trump's national‑security leadership; independent political magazines and international press covered the statement, its signatories, and its atypical nature among former career officials.
Publications
[edit]The Steady State publishes thought pieces from contributors and the organization via Substack, social media, college campus engagement,[33][34] panels,[35] letters and advocacy to Congress, the Administration, and a podcast.
- The Sentinel Podcast[36] launched in January 2026.
- Steady State Accelerating Authoritarian Dynamics Report (updated January 2026).[37][38][39]
- Strategic Business Risk Assessment: Growing Authoritarianism and American Business.[40]
- Steady State members have appeared on PBS Newshour,[41] MS Now,[42] National Public Radio,[43], Salon,[44] Scripps News,[45] Univision,[46] and on the podcasts SpyTalk,[47] Just Security,[48] and The Jack Hopkins Show[49][50][51] and have voiced its views on national security matters.
Organization and Funding
[edit]The Steady State was formalized as a 501(c)(4) nonprofit advocacy organization in 2025; donations are not tax‑deductible. [52][53]
Personnel
[edit]Steven Cash is executive director of The Steady State. He grew up in New York and served as former Senior Advisor the Under Secretary for Intelligence at the Department of Homeland Security and as Chief Counsel and Staff Director (Minority) to a subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee and Chief Counsel to former Senator Dianne Feinstein. He served at the CIA from 1994-2001.[54][55][56] Cash, and other members of The Steady State often comment on key issues of the day, for example, the Iran conflict, and other matters in the media.[57][58]
References
[edit]- ↑ "Donald Trump is dismantling US guardrails, warn former security officials". 2026-08-09. Archived from the original on 2026-08-09. Retrieved 2026-08-10.
- ↑ "Former US officials urge Congress to examine 'weaponization' working group". Reuters. October 21, 2025.
- ↑ "United States • Former CIA officials band together in the 'Steady State' to oppose Trump purges - 17/02/2025". Intelligence Online. 2025-02-17. Retrieved 2025-11-04.
- ↑ Gingold @TheChronicleCT, Ben (2026-02-05). "Ex intelligence officers talk about their political advocacy group at UConn". The Chronicle. Retrieved 2026-02-05.
- ↑ Rory Truex (2026-02-03). National Security Leaders Sound the Alarm on Trump's Authoritarianism | Steven Cash, Steady State. Retrieved 2026-02-05 – via YouTube.
- ↑ Tait, Robert (2026-03-02). "Lack of a clear Iran plan could suck US into a long conflict: 'Where does this go?'". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2026-03-02.
- ↑ Tait, Robert (2026-04-13). "Orbán's defeat holds lessons for US: 'Autocrats may rise, but are not invincible'". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2026-08-10.
- ↑ "The Steady State". The Steady State.
- ↑ "Officials from the 'Steady State' throw their support behind Biden". MSNBC.com. 2020-03-19. Retrieved 2025-05-11.
- ↑ Benen, Steve (2020-03-19). "Officials from the 'Steady State' throw their support behind Biden". MSNBC.com. Retrieved 2025-11-04.
- ↑ "McGrath Campaign: Foreign Policy for America endorses Deb Baldus McGrath for Congress". WisPolitics. 2022-05-26. Retrieved 2025-11-04.
- ↑ "United States • Former intel officials enter political fray to counter Trump - 17/06/2025". Intelligence Online. 2025-06-17. Retrieved 2026-02-06.
- ↑ "More than 80 national security professionals endorse Biden over Trump". The Independent. 2020-03-19. Retrieved 2026-01-29.
- ↑ Longman, Martin (2020-03-19). "The 'Steady State' Endorses Joe Biden for President". Washington Monthly. Retrieved 2026-01-29.
- ↑ "United States • As the midterms approach, intelligence veterans join the campaign - 08/06/2026". Intelligence Online. 2026-06-08. Retrieved 2026-08-10.
- ↑ Brief of The Steady State and Former Nat'l Sec. Officials as Amici Curiae in Opposition to the Department of Justice's Motion to Dismiss, United States v. Flynn, No. 1:17-cr-00232 (D.D.C. June 10, 2020). Available on-line at https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/NatSec-amicus.pdf
- ↑ "DECISIONAL ADVANTAGE AND INTELLIGENCE: THE INTELLIGENCE CYCLE THROUGH THE LENS OF RUSSIAN BOUNTY". July 30, 2020.
- ↑ "Truth and Consequences: COVID, Climate, and National Security in the Age of Trump | Harvard University Center for the Environment". www.environment.harvard.edu. Retrieved 2025-11-04.
- 1 2 Wehner, Greg (2025-08-10). "Ex-government officials pen letter blasting Kash Patel's FBI 'purge'". Fox News. Retrieved 2025-08-11.
- ↑ "FBI abuses and misuses generate angry reactions from bureau veterans, agents association". MSNBC.com. 2025-08-11. Retrieved 2025-08-12.
- ↑ Brief of The Steady State as Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs Regarding the Domestic Deployment of the United States Military and the Engagement of Military Personnel in Civilian Law Enforcement, Case No. 3:25-cv-04870-CRB (N.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2025) (amicus brief on file with the court)
- 1 2 Gambino, Lauren (2025-10-16). "US 'on a trajectory' toward authoritarian rule, ex-officials warn". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2025-11-04.
- ↑ "The Steady State Report: U.S. Democracy in Peril". Law.com. Retrieved 2025-11-04.
- ↑ Cohen, Luc; Lynch, Sarah (2025-10-18). "Bolton faces tougher defense than other Trump foes charged with crimes". Reuters. Retrieved 2026-02-05.
{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ↑ "House Democratic Forum on Privacy Rights and Government Surveillance | Video | C-SPAN.org". www.c-span.org. Retrieved 2026-08-10.
- ↑ Faddis, Sam (2025-08-01). "The Steady State - Treason From Within". AND Magazine. Retrieved 2025-11-04.
- ↑ Saxena, Vivek (2026-03-27). "Former CIA officer recommends anti-Trump protesters use Serbian tactics". BizPac Review. Retrieved 2026-03-28.
- ↑ Tait, Robert (2026-06-11). "FBI agents driven out under Trump assault form support network: 'I'm still a human'". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2026-08-10.
- ↑ "One of Trump's Declassified Documents Raises Major Red Flags". The New Republic. ISSN 0028-6583. Retrieved 2026-08-10.
- ↑ State, The Steady (2025-10-16). "Accelerating Authoritarian Dynamics: Assessment of Democratic Decline". The Steady State. Retrieved 2026-01-29.
- ↑ "United States • Former intel officials enter political fray to counter Trump - 17/06/2025". Intelligence Online. 2025-06-17. Retrieved 2026-08-10.
- ↑ Wilkens, Kathryn (2025-08-09). "'These Regimes Do Not End Well': Group of Former NatSec Officials Warn of FBI 'Purge' in Open Letter to Agency". Mediaite. Retrieved 2026-01-29.
- ↑ Gingold @TheChronicleCT, Ben (2026-02-05). "Ex intelligence officers talk about their political advocacy group at UConn". The Chronicle. Retrieved 2026-02-05.
- ↑ "Former National Security Official Steven Cash '84 Sounds the Alarm About Authoritarianism | Vassar College". www.vassar.edu. Retrieved 2026-02-05.
- ↑ DiMolfetta, David (2025-12-09). "Trump's national security strategy risks blinding US to other threats, former officials warn". Nextgov.com. Retrieved 2026-01-29.
- ↑ "The Steady State Sentinel". Apple Podcasts. Retrieved 2026-01-29.
- ↑ State, The Steady (2025-10-16). "Accelerating Authoritarian Dynamics: Assessment of Democratic Decline". The Steady State. Retrieved 2026-01-29.
- ↑ "2026.01.21, Democracy SITREP.pdf". Google Docs. Retrieved 2026-01-29.
- ↑ DeVega, Chauncey (2025-11-13). "Donald Trump's path to authoritarian rule is wide open". Salon.com. Retrieved 2026-02-05.
- ↑ Admin, T. S. S. (2026-07-16). "Strategic Business Risk Assessment: Growing Authoritarianism and American Business - The Steady State". Retrieved 2026-08-10.
- ↑ Sy, Stephanie; Taraporevala, Kayan; Barnhart, Eliot; Bennett, Geoff; Sagalyn, Dan. "Steven Cash". PBS News. Retrieved 2025-08-07.
- ↑ Bennett, Brian (2026-07-28). "Former intel officials call for investigation into Trump's 2020 election document dump". MS NOW. Retrieved 2026-08-10.
- ↑ Simon, Scott (2025-03-29). "The impact of the Signal security breach, according to a former intelligence officer". NPR. Retrieved 2025-05-27.
- ↑ DeVega, Chauncey (2026-04-02). "Trump treats war as entertainment". Salon.com. Retrieved 2026-08-10.
- ↑ "Steven Cash, executive director of The Steady State, weighs in on Trump's election claims". Scripps News. Retrieved 2026-08-10.
- ↑ "Ver Línea de Fuego, capítulo 98 temporada 2025 por ViX". VIX (in Spanish). Retrieved 2025-05-27.
- ↑ "SpyTalk". MSW Media. Retrieved 2025-05-27.
- ↑ "The Budget Bill and the Future of DHS and ICE". Just Security. 2025-07-18. Retrieved 2025-07-18.
- ↑ From Moscow to MAGA: National Security in the Age of Trump - The Jack Hopkins Show Podcast. 2025-06-17. Retrieved 2025-07-08 – via www.buzzsprout.com.
- ↑ Ex-CIA Insider Breaks Silence: What He Revealed About America's Fragile Future Will Leave You Stunned (And Furious - The Jack Hopkins Show Podcast. 2025-05-31. Retrieved 2025-06-10 – via www.buzzsprout.com.
- ↑ Confronting Curveball: Inside the CIA's Iraq Intelligence Controversy - The Jack Hopkins Show Podcast. 2025-07-01. Retrieved 2025-07-08 – via www.buzzsprout.com.
- ↑ State, The Steady (2025-08-08). "THE STEADY STATE ENDORSES REP. EUGENE VINDMAN FOR CONGRESS". The Steady State. Retrieved 2026-01-29.
- ↑ "Endorsements - The Steady State". thesteadystate.org. 2025-04-22. Retrieved 2026-01-29.
- ↑ "Steven A. Cash | Bios - The Cipher Brief". www.thecipherbrief.com. Retrieved 2026-01-28.
- ↑ Cash, Steven. "A letter from Washington: Donald Trump endangers America". The Journal News. Retrieved 2026-01-29.
- ↑ Steven Cash, Opinion Contributor (2020-01-09). "Why we need a 'Deep State'". The Hill. Archived from the original on 2025-05-06. Retrieved 2026-02-06.
{{cite news}}:|last=has generic name (help) - ↑ Tait, Robert (2026-03-15). "War on Iran may provoke a terrorist attack in US – and that may be the point". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2026-03-28.
- ↑ DeVega, Chauncey (2026-03-16). "A new draft? Unlikely. But Trump still wants the emergency powers". Salon.com. Retrieved 2026-03-28.
- Draft articles about politics and government
- AfC submissions on organisations existing today
- Pending AfC submissions
- AfC pending submissions by age/1 day ago
- AfC submissions by date/10 August 2026
- AfC submissions by date/06 February 2026
- AfC submissions by date/04 November 2025
- AfC submissions by date/28 July 2025
- AfC submissions by date/08 July 2025
- AfC submissions by date/27 May 2025
- AfC submissions by date/13 May 2025


- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.