Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2a7c7b45ecb2780

Jump to content

De Vaucouleurs system

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The de Vaucouleurs system, also known as the revised Hubble system or the de Vaucouleurs–Sandage system, is a comprehensive galaxy morphological classification scheme developed by French astronomer Gérard de Vaucouleurs in 1959. It extends Edwin Hubble's original tuning-fork classification into a three-dimensional parameter space that describes the structural complexity of galaxies.

Historical development

[edit]

Origins (1950s)

[edit]

Gérard de Vaucouleurs (1918–1995) began developing his classification system while working at Mount Stromlo Observatory in Australia (1951–1957), continuing at Lowell Observatory (1957–1958) and Harvard College Observatory (1958–1960). His seminal 1959 paper "Classification and Morphology of External Galaxies," published in Handbuch der Physik, introduced a fundamental revision to Hubble's 1926 scheme.

De Vaucouleurs recognized that Hubble's two-dimensional "tuning fork" diagram could not adequately represent the full diversity of galaxy morphologies. In particular, Hubble's system did not explicitly account for:

Reference catalogues (1960s–1990s)

[edit]

In 1960, de Vaucouleurs joined the University of Texas at Austin as one of the first five faculty members in the newly formed astronomy department, where he spent the remainder of his career. Working with his wife and collaborator Antoinette de Vaucouleurs (1921–1987), he applied his classification system to thousands of galaxies observed at McDonald Observatory.

The Reference Catalogue of Bright Galaxies (RC1) was published in 1964, classifying 2,599 galaxies. This was followed by the Second Reference Catalogue (RC2) in 1976 and the Third Reference Catalogue (RC3) in 1991, each expanding the sample and refining the classification criteria. These catalogues became essential tools for extragalactic astronomers worldwide.

The modern atlas (2007)

[edit]

In 2007, astronomers Ronald J. Buta, Harold G. Corwin, and Stephen C. Odewahn published The de Vaucouleurs Atlas of Galaxies through Cambridge University Press. This comprehensive work illustrated 400 nearby galaxies using modern CCD imagery, updating de Vaucouleurs's original photographic plates for the digital era. The atlas demonstrated that the de Vaucouleurs system remained highly applicable to modern electronic imaging.

The three-dimensional classification volume

[edit]
The de Vaucouleurs classification extends Hubble's tuning fork into a three-dimensional volume with stage (horizontal), family (vertical), and variety (depth) axes.

The fundamental innovation of the de Vaucouleurs system is its representation of galaxy morphology as a **three-dimensional classification volume**, in contrast to Hubble's two-dimensional tuning fork.

De Vaucouleurs Classification Volume
AxisParameterSymbolPhysical Meaning
X (horizontal)StageTPosition along spiral sequence
Y (vertical)FamilyA, AB, BBar strength
Z (depth)Varietyr, rs, sInner ring structure

This volume allows for systematic placement of galaxies based on their structural features, with the understanding that these parameters are not entirely independent—correlations exist between stage, barredness, and ring structure.

Stage parameter (T)

[edit]

The stage parameter provides a numerical index along the morphological sequence, enabling quantitative analysis and computer database applications.

Stage index values

[edit]
De Vaucouleurs Stage Index (T)
TTypeDescriptionTypical ColorsGas Content
−5 to −3EEllipticalsRed (B−V ~ 0.9)<1% mass
−2S0⁻Early lenticularsRed-white<5% mass
−1S0LenticularsWhite~5% mass
0S0/aS0–spiral transitionWhite-blue~10% mass
1SaEarly spiralsBlue-white~15% mass
2SabSa–Sb intermediateBlue~20% mass
3SbModerate spiralsBlue~25% mass
4SbcSb–Sc intermediateBlue~30% mass
5ScLate spiralsBlue (B−V ~ 0.5)~35% mass
6ScdVery late ScVery blue~40% mass
7SdExtremely lateVery blue~45% mass
8SdmMagellanic spiralsBlue~50% mass
9SmMagellanic irregularsBlue>50% mass
10ImIrregularsVery blue>50% mass

Physical correlations

[edit]

The T index correlates strongly with physical galaxy properties:

  • Color index: Earlier types (T < 2) have redder B−V colors (~0.9 for ellipticals); later types (T > 5) are bluer (~0.5 for Sc galaxies)
  • Gas content: Neutral hydrogen (HI) mass fraction increases from <1% in ellipticals to >50% in irregulars
  • Star formation: Specific star formation rate correlates positively with T; late types show vigorous star formation
  • Mass concentration: Bulge-to-total luminosity ratio decreases from ~0.9 in ellipticals to ~0.1 in late spirals
  • Metallicity: Mean stellar metallicity decreases along the sequence from [Fe/H] ~ +0.2 in bulges to [Fe/H] ~ −0.7 in irregulars

Family parameter (Barredness)

[edit]

The family parameter describes the presence and strength of a central bar structure, which plays a crucial role in galaxy dynamics by funneling gas toward the center and driving spiral structure.

Family classifications

[edit]
Family Types
SymbolNameBar StrengthArm OriginFractionExample
SANonbarredNoneNucleus~30%Messier 81
SABWeakly barredIntermediateBar ends/nucleus~40%Messier 83
SBStrongly barredProminentBar ends~30%NGC 1300

Approximately 60–70% of spiral galaxies show some bar structure, making the family parameter essential for complete classification.

Visual comparison

[edit]

Lenticular galaxy families

[edit]

For lenticular galaxies (S0), the family notation indicates:

  • SA0: Unbarred lenticular — smooth disk without bar
  • SB0: Barred lenticular — shows bar in disk
  • S0: Indeterminate bar (usually edge-on orientation)

Variety parameter (ring structure)

[edit]

The variety parameter characterizes the presence of inner ring structures, which form at resonance locations in the galactic disk.

Variety classifications

[edit]
Variety Types
SymbolNameStructureArm AttachmentPhysical Origin
(r)RingedComplete inner ringArms begin tangent to ringResonance at inner Lindblad resonance
(rs)PseudoringPartial/broken ringArms begin near ring featureTransient or forming resonance
(s)SpiralNo ringArms begin at center or bar endsNo resonance feature

Ring structures are most prominent at intermediate stages (S0/a to Sb) and become less distinct at both early (E, S0) and late (Sc, Irr) stages. The presence of rings correlates with resonant orbits in the galactic disk and provides constraints on galaxy mass distributions.

Extended notation

[edit]

Outer rings (R)

[edit]

Outer ring structures, which form at the outer Lindblad resonance, are denoted by prepending to the classification:

  • R: Definite outer ring (e.g., RSB(r)bc)
  • (R): Outer pseudoring or outer lens structure (e.g., (R)SA(rs)ab)

Approximately 10–15% of spiral galaxies show prominent outer rings.

Arm classes

[edit]

De Vaucouleurs originally distinguished arm morphology:

These append the stage letter: Sbm, Scf. While less commonly used today, this distinction relates to spiral arm generation mechanisms.

Lenses

[edit]

Lens-like structures (regions with shallow brightness gradients) are denoted:

  • (l): Inner lens (e.g., S0(l))
  • (L): Outer lens

Notable galaxy examples

[edit]
Galaxies by de Vaucouleurs Type
GalaxyClassificationTDistance (Mly)Notes
Messier 87E+0-1−454Giant elliptical; Virgo Cluster cD galaxy
NGC 4346SB0−150Barred lenticular in Canes Venatici
Messier 81SA(s)ab212Grand-design unbarred spiral; Bode's Galaxy
Milky WaySAB(rs)bc40Weak bar; pseudoring; intermediate stage
Andromeda GalaxySA(s)b32.5Unbarred; nearest major spiral
Messier 83SAB(s)c515Weakly barred; "Southern Pinwheel"
NGC 1300SB(s)bc461Prototypical barred spiral
NGC 1512(R)SB(r)ab238Double-ringed barred galaxy
Large Magellanic CloudSB(s)m90.16Magellanic type; satellite of Milky Way
Small Magellanic CloudSB(s)m pec90.20Peculiar Magellanic irregular

Comparison with other classification systems

[edit]
Galaxy Classification Systems Comparison
FeatureHubble (1926)de Vaucouleurs (1959)Yerkes (MK) (1960s)DSS (1990s)
Dimensions2D tuning fork3D volume2D + luminosityAutomated
StagesE, S0, Sa–Sc, IrrExtended T (−5 to +10)Modified stagesPhotometric
BarrednessSB onlySA, SAB, SBSimilarBar/No bar
RingsImplicitExplicit (r, rs, s)ImplicitNot included
Numerical indexNoYes (T)YesYes
Luminosity classNoNoYes (I–V)No
Physical basisMorphologicalMorphologicalPhysicalPhotometric

The de Vaucouleurs system provides the most comprehensive purely morphological classification, while the Yerkes system adds physical parameters through luminosity classes.

Scientific applications

[edit]

Galaxy evolution studies

[edit]

The de Vaucouleurs system provides a framework for studying galaxy evolution through morphological transformation:

The T parameter serves as a proxy for evolutionary state, with galaxies generally evolving from late to early types through environmental and internal processes.

Modern surveys

[edit]

The de Vaucouleurs system remains standard in large-scale galaxy surveys:

  • Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS): Morphological classifications for >10⁶ galaxies
  • Galaxy Zoo: Citizen science project using de Vaucouleurs types; >10⁸ classifications by volunteers
  • 2MASS (Two Micron All Sky Survey): Near-infrared morphologies compared to optical de Vaucouleurs types
  • Spitzer S4G (Survey of Stellar Structure in Galaxies): Mid-infrared morphologies at 3.6 and 4.5 μm

Machine learning applications

[edit]

Modern machine learning algorithms trained on Galaxy Zoo data can automatically assign de Vaucouleurs T types with >90% accuracy for bright galaxies. These automated classifications enable morphological studies of millions of galaxies in upcoming surveys like LSST and Euclid.

Limitations and criticisms

[edit]

Despite its widespread use, the de Vaucouleurs system has recognized limitations:

  • Subjectivity: Visual classification depends on observer experience and training; different classifiers may assign different types to the same galaxy
  • Wavelength dependence: Morphology varies with observation wavelength; optical (B-band) classifications differ from infrared (K-band)
  • High-redshift effects: Cosmological evolution and surface brightness dimming complicate classification of distant galaxies (z > 0.5)
  • Peculiar galaxies: Interacting and merging systems often resist standard classification
  • Environmental bias: Field galaxies are easier to classify than crowded cluster galaxies
  • Surface brightness limit: Low surface brightness features (outer rings, faint bars) may be missed

Alternative and complementary systems include:

Legacy

[edit]

Gérard de Vaucouleurs's classification system revolutionized extragalactic astronomy by providing a comprehensive framework that captures the complexity of galaxy morphology. The system remains the dominant classification scheme in professional astronomy more than six decades after its introduction, a testament to its utility and flexibility. The 2007 atlas ensures that de Vaucouleurs's work continues to inform 21st-century galaxy studies.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  • Buta, R., Corwin, H., & Odewahn, S. (2007). The de Vaucouleurs Atlas of Galaxies. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-82048-6
  • de Vaucouleurs, G. (1959). "Classification and Morphology of External Galaxies." Handbuch der Physik, 53, 275–310
  • de Vaucouleurs, G., & de Vaucouleurs, A. (1964). Reference Catalogue of Bright Galaxies. University of Texas Press
  • de Vaucouleurs, G., de Vaucouleurs, A., & Corwin, H. G. (1976). Second Reference Catalogue of Bright Galaxies. University of Texas Press
  • de Vaucouleurs, G., et al. (1991). Third Reference Catalogue of Bright Galaxies. Springer-Verlag
  • Sandage, A., & Tammann, G. A. (1981). A Revised Shapley-Ames Catalog of Bright Galaxies. Carnegie Institution
  • Buta, R. (2013). "Galaxy Morphology." In Planets, Stars and Stellar Systems, Volume 6, Springer
[edit]