Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21c49a5ed565e37

Jump to content

Wool classing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Parts of a Merino fleece
Throwing a freshly shorn fleece onto a wool table for skirting and classing.
Wool classing in Australia, c.1900

Wool classing is the production of uniform, predictable, low-risk lines of wool, carried out by examining the characteristics of the wool in its raw state[1] and classing (grading) it accordingly. Wool classing is done by a wool classer.

Basis for classification

[edit]

Some of the qualities a wool classer examines when classing wool are:[2]

  • Breed of the sheep: Shedding breeds will increase the risk of medullated or pigmented fibers. Any sheep likely to have dark fibers should be shorn last to avoid contamination. The age of the sheep will have a bearing on the diameter and value of the fibers of wool, too.
  • Usage of chemicals: Ensure that all rules are followed.
  • Brands, seedy jowls, and shanks: Must be removed from fleeces and broken.
  • Stains: Must be removed from bellies and fleeces and identified in a separate line.

  • Spinning capacity: The number of bends per unit length along the wool fiber approximately indicates the spinning capacity of the wool. Fibers with a fine crimp have many bends and usually have a small diameter. Such fibers can be spun into fine yarns, with great lengths of yarn for a given weight of wool, and higher market value. Fine fibers may be utilized in the production of fine garments such as men's suits whereas the coarser fibers may be used for the manufacture of carpet and other sturdy products. The unit of measurement is crimps per inch or crimps per centimeter. The average diameter or mean fiber diameter is measured in micrometers (microns). Before the advent of technology to measure crimps and diameter, English wool-handlers categorized wool based on their fineness by estimating spinning capacity using vision and touch, which is known as the Bradford system.[3] Early projection-microscope methods for measuring fibre diameter existed from around the turn of the century, but their cost, fragility, and slow throughput made them unsuitable for use at ordinary trading stations, where wool still had to be classed by hand and eye.[4][5] In the early twentieth century, experimental instruments were developed to make the assessment of wool fineness more objective, but visual classing remained dominant in routine trade until standardized laboratory measurements became widely available.[6][7]
  • Strength (also known as tensile strength): Determines the wool's ability to withstand processing. Weaker wool produces more waste in carding and spinning, and may be used for the production of felt or combined with other fibers,.
  • Color: Indicates whether wool can be dyed in light shades. Color may be graded depending upon the natural color, impurities, and various stains present. Severely stained wool decreases prices dramatically. However, it is hard to assess color accurately without proper measurement, since some stains will wash out in the processing, whereas others are quite persistent.
Wool classing room, Queensland, Australia, circa 1926

Attempts to introduce new or unfamiliar measuring devices at individual stations were sometimes resisted by experienced classers, who regarded hand-and-eye judgment as more reliable than untested instruments.[4][5]

Procedure

[edit]

The fleece is skirted to remove excess fibres, seeds, burrs, etc. to leave the fleece as reasonably even as possible. The wool taken from different parts of a sheep are graded separately. The fleece forming the bulk of the yield is placed with other fleece wool as the main line, while other pieces such as the neck, belly, and skirting (inferior wool from edges) are sold for such purposes where the shorter wools are required (for example fillings, carpets, insulation). While in some places, crimp may determine which grade the fleece will be put into, this subjective assessment is not always reliable, and processors prefer that wools are measured objectively by qualified laboratories. Some of the superfine wool growers do in-shed wool testing, but this can only be used as a guide. This enables wool classers to place wool into lines of a consistent quality. A shed hand, known as a wool presser, places the wool into approved wool packs in a wool press to produce a bale of wool that must meet regulations concerning its fastenings, length, weight, and branding if it is to be sold at auction in Australasia. Handling and packing raw wool carried a recognized occupational risk of infection through cuts or puncture wounds, historically termed 'wool-sorter's disease.'[5] All Merino fleece wool sold at auction in Australia is objectively measured for fiber diameter, yield (including the amount of vegetable matter), staple length, staple strength, and sometimes color.[2]

A classer is also responsible for a pre-shearing check to be made to ensure that the wool and sheep areas are free of possible contaminants. A classer supervises shed staff during shearing, and trains any inexperienced hands. At the end of shearing, classers have to provide full documentation concerning the clip. Equipment and records used at individual trading stations were rarely preserved beyond their working life, and were often discarded, reassigned, or shipped elsewhere once superseded by newer methods.[5]

Regional practices

[edit]

In the early twentieth century, wool from smaller or more remote producing regions was often exported largely raw or lightly sorted through coastal trading posts, under contract to larger trading houses based elsewhere, before being reclassed at continental depots.[8]

At such remote or seasonal stations, classing duties were sometimes carried out by temporary staff with limited formal training, working under the general supervision of a resident sorting master.[8]

Other systems of wool grading

[edit]

"Blood" or "Blood system" was one of the old ways to grade wool. It was a term that was used with different fractions to show how much merino blood a sheep has. Each blood grade corresponds to a numerical grading system based on the yarn's fineness or count.[9][10]

Some trading firms addressed the lack of objective measurement by distributing standardized reference samples to their stations, against which classers could compare raw wool by eye or touch — an intermediate step between purely subjective classing and later objective measurement.[4] Several independent attempts to devise practical instruments for judging wool fineness are known from the early twentieth century, though most went undocumented or unpatented, making priority difficult to establish in retrospect.[4]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. Australian Wool Corporation; Australian Council of Wool Exporters (1989). Code of practice for the preparation of Australian wool clips, July 1989. Melbourne: Australian Wool Corporation.
  2. 1 2 Wool Classification Manual by the National Wool Growers Association, of Southafrica
  3. "The Mysteries of Bradford and Micron Counts". paradisefibersblog. 2014-06-25. Retrieved 2017-09-23.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Australian Wool Corporation (1974). Papers Presented at the Objective Measurement Symposium—Australia: Melbourne, March 1974. Melbourne: Australian Wool Corporation.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Whan, Robert Bruce (1971). The Economics of Wool Classing (Report). Wool Economic Research Report. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
  6. Australian Wool Corporation (1990). Australian Woolclassing: A Text for the Modern Professional. Parkville, VIC: Australian Wool Corporation, Raw Wool Services. p. 64.
  7. D'Arcy, J. B. (1986). Sheep Management and Wool Technology (2nd ed., reprinted with minor revisions ed.). Kensington, NSW: New South Wales University Press. p. 193.
  8. 1 2 Australia. Bureau of Agricultural Economics (1973). Store Classing and Small Lot Handling. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
  9. American Fabrics Magazine (1960). AF encyclopedia of textiles. Internet Archive. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall. p. 133.
  10. Christie, James Wiley (1945). Grading Wool. U.S. Department of Agriculture. p. 11.