Wikipedia:WikiProject Freemasonry/Assessment

The process of rating articles is not an easy one—the distinction between a B-class article and a Start-class article can be difficult to make, and even the difference between a stub and a Start-class article is not always crystal clear. If you have concerns about the classification of a Freemasonry-related article (currently very preliminary), do not hesitate to voice your opinion here.

• There are no disputed assessments at this time.

Current Backlog as of December 2012

Over the last few / next few days I have / will have dealt with the entire backlog of articles without a class or importance rating. I am not married to any rating I have made - if you disagree just change it, though if you're changing from to or from Top or High, then do please let me know by posting here. My criteria became more informed as I progressed through the project but at bottom I applied the lowest justifiable rating, which I think is a reasonable way of going about this. And, as you've seen, I've tried to update the documentation concerning article assessment as well. Thanks for letting me help out and for putting up with all the additions on your watchlists.
kcylsnavS{^screech_harrass} 02:34, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 Done
kcylsnavS{^screech_harrass} 19:31, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Congratulations and thanks for a load of hard work. Degree (Freemasonry) was an unmarked redirect. Have adjusted. There are a few where the edit summary says Low importance and the talk page something else. My biggest query would be High importance on Anthony Sayer, about whom next to nothing is known. Fiddlersmouth (talk) 22:23, 29 December 2012 (UTC)