Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:
You can sign up to receive a user talk page invitation to participate in discussions of interest to you, see Wikipedia:Feedback request serviceTalk:Jacobian conjecture
Which of the following categories, related to the 2026 Claude Mythos-assisted disproof for dimension n≥3, should be included in this article?
For a while now, criteria has been absent for tornado sections in tornado outbreak articles, which makes determining what needs a section and what doesn't much more difficult, so I have gone ahead and created some criteria, which is listed below. I am requesting feedback in order to reach a consensus and establish a set of criteria for all tornado sections that can be widely used. Another reason for this proposal is to allow pages such as List of notable United States tornadoes in 2026 to exist, which would allow for tornadoes that are notable but do not have a parent outbreak article with a dedication section to receive a proper section of their own, such as the Garden City, MS EF3 earlier this year. Despite causing over 20 injuries, damaging numerous homes and structures, tracking for 80 miles, and impacting several communities (including a mobile home park that was basically demolished), it has only has a summary that's a few sentences long in Tornadoes of 2026 and List of United States tornadoes from May to June 2026. Because of this, my proposed criteria will also be for List of notable United States tornadoes in 2026, so that it is much clearer on what can actually go on the page. @ChessEric we talked about this back in April, so I figured you might be interested in this discussion.
The criteria is below:
Tornado Section Criteria:
At least 2 to 3 well-developed paragraphs
It should not include information on the aftermath.
This is different for each case; if a tornado was destructive and/or has scientific, historical, or other significance but had no casualties, it will still be able to receive a section.
It inflicted significant damage
This is different for each case; if an EF2 tornado was long-tracked but only significantly damaged a couple homes (similar to the Lena, IL EF2), it shouldn't get a subsection. However, a damaging tornado like the Merrillville, IN EF2should receive a section.
Historical/Meteorological significance
This is part of the reason I gave the Ringle, WI EF3 tornado a subsection, as intense and destructive tornadoes for that area are quite rare.
In the list "Violence by UFO believers", what is within scope for inclusion?
To an extent consistent with WP:BLPCRIME, instances of a person committing an act of violence if WP:RS documents the act of violence, and separate RS establish the person's belief in UFOs or aliens.
To an extent consistent with BLPCRIME, instances of a person committing an act of violence if RS both documents the act of violence and the person's belief in UFOs or aliens.
To an extent consistent with BLPCRIME, instances of a person committing an act of violence if RS both document the act of violence and the person's in UFOs or aliens, but not if the RS also indicates they experienced a psychological error at the time of the act.
RS document the act of violence and its connection to the person's belief in UFOs / aliens
Add the tag {{rfc|xxx}} at the top of a talk page section, where "xxx" is the category abbreviation. The different category abbreviations that should be used with {{rfc}} are listed above in parenthesis. Multiple categories are separated by a vertical pipe. For example, {{rfc|xxx|yyy}}, where "xxx" is the first category and "yyy" is the second category.
