Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tasc0

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tasc0}} to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Tasc0

• Tasc0 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
• Mcanmoocanu (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)

• Code letter: F

• Supporting evidence: Tasc0 (talk · contribs) was banned today by the community following this discussion. Mcanmoocanu (talk · contribs) left this message on his own talk page following a conversation with Tasc0 and left this personal attack (which was subsequently blanked) on Tasc0's talk page.

I have blocked Mcanmoocanu indefinitely pending an acceptable explanation - regardless of anything else, this comment is wholly unacceptable behavior.

My first thought is that they might be roommates and that this is now a compromised account, since, apparently, these were two different people, but Mcanmoocanu seems to be Tasc0 now. Please check to confirm whether or not Mcanmoocanu is a compromised account or whether Tasc0 is evading his ban via Mcanmoocanu. Thank you. --B (talk) 04:57, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Both of these editors are Unrelated - Alison ^❤ 05:18, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Is Mcanmoocanu definitely not a compromised account? I'm still going to leave the account blocked for the time being based on - this is wholly unacceptable. Thanks. --B (talk) 10:54, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

It doesn't appear to be compromised, far as I can see. There's always the 'roommate' possibility - Alison ^❤ 16:32, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.