Wikipedia:Peer review/Mortal wound/archive2
| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because… I would be grateful if I could get a class and importance rating for my article. Thank you so much, --MeerkatShadow (talk) 17:44, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Comments from Tom (LT)
[edit]@MeerkatShadow that's great! A fascinating and reasonable well-written article. Some comments:
- "Being Frightened is not a Moral Wound" in the lead mentions "moral" not "mortal"
- I think at the moment the article has a good overview of when the words "mortal wound" are used - which might make it more suitable as a list such as List of uses of mortal wound (I'm not sure that list would be notable though). The article could be improved by adding some elements of synthesis - like, what connotations did mortal wound have, what type of wounds are considered mortal and did that change - sort of, general themes that have emerged on review. To do this, you'll need to find some secondary sources that have examined the topic area, as on Wikipedia we don't do original research ourselves.
This is a fascinating topic area and I think you've made a good start. Let me know if you have any other questions. Good luck! --Tom (LT) (talk) 02:05, 27 November 2018 (UTC)