Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a27ec89b4946984a

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Peer review/List of unanswered reviews

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page contains an automatically-generated list of reviews that are unanswered. This list is compiled automatically by detecting reviews that have not been edited at all after their initial creation.

Because of this, this list won't identify reviews which have been subsequently edited. Though such reviews are still displayed in full on the peer review main page, peer reviews that haven't been reviewed and aren't listed here can be added here.

Arts

[edit]


I've listed this article for peer review because I believe that this article has GA potential. Please give advice on where this article can elaborate more on - more general advice on writing style and organization is also welcome.

Thanks, Tunnelcrawlerwyan (talk) 16:35, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply



I've listed this article for peer review because I believe it may be eligible for good article status. However, I am unsure whether anything else needs to be added to the article. Any comments would be appreciated.

Thanks, Mr Sitcom (talk) 09:26, 29 July 2026 (UTC)reply














Everyday life

[edit]

Engineering and technology

[edit]






I've listed this article for peer review because I'm trying to make this a GA. Any feedback is welcome, and I would especially appreciate feedback from non-technical readers to ensure it complies with WP:TECHNICAL and WP:SUMMARY.

Thanks, H2so4aq (talk) 05:17, 8 June 2026 (UTC)reply

General

[edit]








I've listed this article for peer review because I am aiming to nominate it for FA status sometime soon. This would be the second FA nomination connected to the Tomodachi Life series, the first having been this game's predecessor, Tomodachi Collection (2009). All comments are appreciated!

Thanks, TheBrickGraphic (talk) 17:14, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Geography and places

[edit]






This article is a mess and it's extremely vital to Botswana. I don't even know where to start and I would really like a second opinion, because I had plans for this article until I wikibonked and even had to check the Grokipedia page. (I swear on my life this will never happen again)

Thanks, splains (💬/📝) 02:09, 28 June 2026 (UTC)reply

History

[edit]







Natural sciences and mathematics

[edit]


I want to get this article to FL, but I am largely unfamilial with the FL process and need feedback on what tweaks that need to be made before I nominate it.

Thanks, ZKevinTheCat (talk) 12:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply










I have listed this article for peer review because I have substantially revamped it, and I would like to have input and assistance from others to ensure that it meets the standards that are expected for species articles, as this is my first time working on one.

Prior to editing the article, hardly anything was cited and much of the writing was left over from when it was created in 2006. This needed addressing; for example, there is 20 years of incorrect information across many different websites that resulted from this article mistakenly assigning the name "ankomba joby" to the diademed sifaka, even though it refers to a different species. My initial goal was to find citations for the sentences that were already present. This turned into re-wording many of them to maintain an encyclopedic tone, and finally I began to add more content based on research articles I had found while in the process of finding sources. This has resulted in an article that is quite different from how it was when I found it.

Thanks, Babacoote (talk) 17:48, 17 May 2026 (UTC)reply

Language and literature

[edit]



Philosophy and religion

[edit]




Social sciences and society

[edit]


The article has just been promoted to GA status, and before I start working on it towards featured status, I would like to get a peer review so I can focus on the areas that require improvement. As this is my first attempt at promoting an article to featured status, I do not want to spend time working on areas that may not require any improvement, out of concern that, instead of improving the article, I might inadvertently make it worse. As the saying goes, "if it ain't broke, don't fix it".

Thanks, Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 03:35, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply








Lists

[edit]


I've listed this article for peer review because I want to submit it for Featured List consideration, I have put work into this article originally in a sandbox which is why the time the page has been live looks shorter. But I believe it is ready and would like feedback because I am only human. Thank you!

Thanks, Watagwaan? I really like the color red! 16:51, 13 July 2026 (UTC)reply



I've listed this article for peer review because I want this to be a featured list. The main problem currently is the references, so help in that would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks, Thelifeofan413 (talk) 07:53, 11 July 2026 (UTC)reply



I would like to take this list to FLC and would like to prepare for it.

Thanks, Pietrus1 (talk) 01:14, 25 May 2026 (UTC)reply


WikiProject peer-reviews

[edit]