Wikipedia:Peer review/List of unanswered reviews

MainUn­an­swe­redIn­struc­tionsDi­scus­sionToolsAr­chivePro­ject

This page contains an automatically-generated list of reviews that are unanswered. This list is compiled automatically by detecting reviews that have not been edited at all after their initial creation.

Because of this, this list won't identify reviews which have been subsequently edited. Though such reviews are still displayed in full on the peer review main page, peer reviews that haven't been reviewed and aren't listed here can be added here.

Arts

Dungeons & Dealers

I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to get it to featured article status. I want to ensure the writing is professional and understandable, any help is appreciated! :)

Thanks, Crystal Drawers 🎖️ ^{(wanna talk?)} 19:32, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Conformity Gate

I've listed this article for peer review because I want to make it ready for featured article candidacy. This is my first attempt to create a featured article.

Thanks, In solidarity, Brynn Who Likes Editing | talk w/ me! 10:04, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Mi Reflejo

Previous peer review

I've listed this article for peer review because I almost confident that the articles meets FA standards, but I would like to have it peer reviewed before nominating it at FAC. Thanks!

Thanks, Erick (talk) 05:10, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

Everyday life

1986 Intercontinental Cup

Previous peer review

I'm not sure why I don't feel good about this article, I would be happy to evaluate its contents and, specifically, its sources in detail. Riverplateño (talk) 14:03, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Engineering and technology

Leaky integrator

I've listed this article for peer review because I am proposing a substantial extending of the existing article. The proposed version is currently at User:DDadyka/Leaky integrator. I would particularly appreciate comments on the mathematical correctness, article structure, and whether the userspace draft would be an improvement over the current article. Thanks, DDadyka (talk) 19:09, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

General

Digital Dance Mix Vol. 1 Namie Amuro

I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to bring it to FA status. I am the main author of this article and successfully brought it to GA in February this year. I believe it is nearly ready for FAC. This will be my first FA nomination, so I appreciate any comments and assistance. Thank you! MidnightMayhem (talk) 02:38, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

Daffodil International University

I am requesting a peer review of the Daffodil International University article.

I have substantially expanded and improved the article, including its history, campus, research, international collaborations, student life, and other sections, with an emphasis on reliable and independent sources.

I would particularly appreciate community feedback on the following:

• whether the article is sufficiently neutral and encyclopedic;
• whether the cited sources adequately support the claims;
• whether independently sourced content has appropriate encyclopedic value;
• whether any sections contain excessive directory-like detail;
• whether the structure and level of detail are appropriate for a university article;
• whether any important information is missing or unnecessarily detailed; and
• what improvements would be needed to bring the article toward B-class or Good Article quality.

Some previously included material, including information about faculties/departments and residential facilities, has recently been removed on the grounds that Wikipedia is not a directory or that the material has insufficient encyclopedic value. I understand that not every verifiable fact necessarily belongs in an article, but I would appreciate independent community feedback on where the appropriate level of detail should be drawn, particularly where the removed information was supported by independent reliable sources.

Please independently review the article and advise what content should be retained, rewritten, or removed..

Thanks, 0ximjub43r (talk) 19:28, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

History

Timeline of the Islamic State (2026)

I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to someday get my article promoted to WP:FL. I am just looking for any suggestions I can get!

Thanks, Militant.Insurgency (talk) 03:38, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

Battle of Petrograd

I've listed this article for peer review because I have done some significant cleanup on it and have improved the sourcing, and I would like some pointers on how it could be improved beyond where it is now. I know that Military History in general has a lot of detail involved.

Thanks, Packrat3860 (talk) 05:21, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

Justina Szilágyi

Previous peer review

I have listed this article for a second peer review because it received a detailed, critical and very helpful review from JimKillock more than two years ago. I hope that I have addressed the problems raised during the previous review, but the article would benefit from further suggestions on how to improve its comprehensiveness, conciseness and style. Thank you for your time. Borsoka (talk) 12:22, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Natural sciences and mathematics

Commognition

I've listed this article for peer review because the article fills a real gap within the encyclopedia yet because of the current large backlog, it is still not reviwed.

Thanks, RetiredResearchKing123 (talk) 13:29, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

List of mammals of Missouri

I want to get this article to FL, but I am largely unfamilial with the FL process and need feedback on what tweaks that need to be made before I nominate it.

Thanks, ZKevinTheCat (talk) 12:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

WikiProject peer-reviews

• WikiProject Military history: Battle of Petrograd • Byrhtnoth • Misneach • Otvet • Pacifism in France • Timeline of the Islamic State (2026)