Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25db295c8003488

Jump to content

Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here  discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.

This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header (dark green when in dark mode) appears under each daily section  it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.

Broad Peak
Broad Peak

Glossary

[edit source]
  • Blurbs are one-sentence summaries of the news story.
    • Altblurbs, labelled alt1, alt2, etc., are alternative suggestions to cover the same story.
    • A target article, bolded in text, is the focus of the story. Each blurb must have at least one such article, but you may also link non-target articles.
  • Articles in the Ongoing line describe events getting continuous coverage.
  • The Recent deaths (RD) line includes any living thing whose death was recently announced. Consensus may decide to create a blurb for a recent death.

All articles featured in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality.

Nomination steps

[edit source]
  • Make sure the item you want to nominate has an article that meets our minimum requirements and contains reliable coverage of a current event you want to create a blurb about. We will not post about events described in an article that fails our quality standards.
  • Find the correct section below for the date of the event (not the date nominated). Do not add sections for new dates manually – a bot does that for us each day at midnight (UTC).
  • Create a level 4 header with the article name (==== Your article here ====). Add (RD) or (Ongoing) if appropriate.
Then paste the {{ITN candidate}} template with its parameters and fill them in. The news source should be reliable, support your nomination and be in the article. Write your blurb in simple present tense. Below the template, briefly explain why we should post that event. After that, save your edit. Your nomination is ready!
  • You may add {{ITN note}} to the target article's talk page to let editors know about your nomination.

The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.

Purge this page to update the cache

Headers

[edit source]
  • When the article is ready, updated and there is consensus to post, you can mark the item as (Ready). Remove that wording if you feel the article fails any of these necessary criteria.
  • Admins should always separately verify whether these criteria are met before posting items marked (Ready). For more guidance, check WP:ITN/A.
    • If satisfied, post the item and change the header to (Posted).
    • Where there is no consensus, close the discussion section and change the header to (Closed). If the article's quality remains poor, leave a brief note explaining why to encourage and assist others in fixing it.
    • Sometimes, editors ask to retract an already-posted nomination because of a fundamental error or because consensus changed. If you feel the community supports this, remove the item and mark the item as (Pulled).

Voicing an opinion on an item

[edit source]

Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated.

Please do...

[edit source]
  1. Pick an older item to review near the bottom of this page, before the eligibility runs out and the item scrolls off the page and gets abandoned in the archive, unused and forgotten.
  2. Review an item even if it has already been reviewed by another user. You may be the first to spot a problem, or the first to confirm that an identified problem was fixed. Piling on the list of "support!" votes will help administrators see what is ready to be posted on the Main Page.
  3. Tell about problems in articles if you see them. Be bold and fix them yourself if you know how, or tell others if it's not possible.

Please do not...

[edit source]
  1. Add simple "support!" or "oppose!" votes without including your reasons. Similarly, curt replies such as "who?", "meh", or "duh!" are not helpful. A vote without reasoning means little for us, please elaborate yourself.
  2. Oppose an item just because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. We post a lot of such content, so these comments are generally unproductive.
  3. Accuse other editors of supporting, opposing or nominating due to a personal bias (such as ethnocentrism). We at ITN do not handle conflicts of interest.
  4. Comment on a story without first reading the relevant article(s).
  5. Oppose a recurring item here because you disagree with the recurring items criteria. Discuss them here.
  6. Use ITN as a forum for your own political or personal beliefs. Such comments are irrelevant to the outcome and are potentially disruptive.

Suggesting updates

[edit source]

There are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:

  • Anything that does not change the intent of the blurb (spelling, grammar, markup issues, updating death tolls etc.) should be discussed at WP:Errors.
  • Discuss major changes in the blurb's intent or very complex updates as part of the current ITNC nomination.
Skip to top
Skip to bottom

Structure

[edit source]

This page contains a section for each day and a sub-section for each nomination. Eight days of current nominations are maintained – older days are archived.

To see the size and title of each section, please expand the following section size summary.


August 4

[edit source]

August 3

[edit source]

RD: Mateusz Bąk

[edit source]
Article: Mateusz Bąk (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)Credits:

Article needs updating
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Polish footballer, Lechia Gdańsk legend. Article very undercited and I have orange tagged it, needs updating on his post-playing years and death, but plenty of sources available if any of the footballing editors would like to expand the article. Abcmaxx (talk) 08:15, 4 August 2026 (UTC)reply

RD: Jimmy Cricket

[edit source]
Article: Jimmy Cricket (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC News
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Northern Irish comedian. ItsShandog (talk) 16:36, 3 August 2026 (UTC)reply

August 2

[edit source]

RD: Rod Liddle

[edit source]
Article: Rod Liddle (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Guardian
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Controversial journalist whose later writings were provocative (to say the least) along with some, er, interesting events in his personal life. Article is orange-tagged for neutrality but no serious discussion on talk page for nearly two years so that can probably be removed (and I note his most famous outrageous quote isn't even mentioned in the article!). Article is pretty-well sourced, there may be a few odd statements. Black Kite (talk) 14:34, 3 August 2026 (UTC)reply

POV tag was removed a matter of minutes before you posted here and the "shag the kids" quote had been removed about an hour ago. I readded it in a way that was actually due. I also added a couple of cn tags.--Launchballer 15:02, 3 August 2026 (UTC)reply

RD: Kay Granger

[edit source]
Article: Kay Granger (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CBS News
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Texas congresswoman who once was the Chair of the powerful House Appropriations Committee. Very fresh news, so article may need further updating. FlipandFlopped 01:40, 3 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Agreed, more info about her tenure as mayor of Fort Worth is needed. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 01:25, 4 August 2026 (UTC)reply

August 1

[edit source]

(Posted separate blurb and RD) 2026 Broad Peak avalanche & RD: Nirmal Purja

[edit source]
Proposed image
Articles: Nirmal Purja (talk · history · tag) and 2026 Broad Peak avalanche (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination
Blurb:  In Pakistan, an avalanche on Broad Peak kills ten climbers, including Nepalese-British mountaineer Nirmal Purja (pictured). (Post)
Alternative blurb: Nepalese-British mountaineer Nirmal Purja is killed along with nine others following an avalanche in the Pakistani Himalayas.
Alternative blurb 2: In Pakistan, an avalanche on Broad Peak kills ten climbers. (This leaves Nirmal Purja, Nadhira Al Harthy, Pur Bahadur Gurung and others for the RD line as separate ITN candidates.)
News source(s): The Kathmandu Post
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Nepali mountaineer known for record‑setting speed ascents. ItsShandog (talk) 11:16, 1 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Merged nom - ArionStar (talk · contribs) nominated the broader avalanche article a few hours later, so I've merged it in here. Support, receiving sustainable news coverage, in the news, Purja seems to be a "top of his field" sort of character, so both the incident and his article should be bolded per WP:ITNRDBLURB. — Knightoftheswords 15:32, 1 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Support alt blurb as the avalanche and Purja are notable. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 15:58, 1 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Support Article is of sufficient quality for ITN. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 01:25, 2 August 2026 (UTC)reply

RD: Vincent Pastore

[edit source]
Article: Vincent Pastore (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: American actor. Best known for his role in The Sopranos. CantBelieveINeedAnAccount (talk) 02:15, 2 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Not yet ready Several unsourced paragraphs and unsourced acting credits section. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 13:19, 2 August 2026 (UTC)reply

July 31

[edit source]

RD: Pepe Villalobos

[edit source]
Article: Pepe Villalobos (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s):
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Composer and musician José Villalobos Cavero, better known as Pepe Villalobos. The so-called "King of Festejo", he was an important figure in Peru's música criolla/Afro-Peruvian music scene. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🧸 08:55, 1 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Support Article is of sufficient quality for RD. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 03:08, 4 August 2026 (UTC)reply

RD: Glenn A. Baker

[edit source]
Article: Glenn A. Baker (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): ABC News
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Music journalist. Edited Billboard magazine for 20 years. Article is in surprisingly good shape. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:48, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply

Not yet ready Article still has a couple of CN tags. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 04:16, 1 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Done. All cited now. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 05:54, 1 August 2026 (UTC)reply

RD/Blurb: Franco Baresi

[edit source]
Article: Franco Baresi (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination
Blurb:  Former Italian footballer and manager Franco Baresi dies at the age of 66. (Post)Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Italian footballer. One of the greatest defenders to ever grace the game Shakya2007 (talk) 05:55, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply

What do you mean "let's be serious here", @Orbitalbuzzsaw. He's listed as Vital 5, and we blurb a lot of people who are Vital 5. There's a case to be made that he shouldn't be blurbed, but it's 100% arguable that he should be blurbed. So don't stay stuff like that, save it for those that we don't consider vital. Nfitz (talk) 04:26, 1 August 2026 (UTC)reply
His death is not notable, and whatever his vital status may be he is not a household name anywhere except maybe Italy. That should be our standard and even then “household name” should be interpreted very conservatively - Thatcher, Mandela, Jane Goodall is the marginal case This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 15:28, 1 August 2026 (UTC)reply

July 30

[edit source]

RD: Beto Cabrera

[edit source]
Article: Beto Cabrera (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s):
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Argentine actor and comedian, best known during the 1960s and 1970s as one half of a comedy duo with es:Mario Sánchez (actor). GreenLipstickLesbian💌🧸 07:25, 2 August 2026 (UTC)reply

RD: Kazimira Prunskienė

[edit source]
Article: Kazimira Prunskienė (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): LRT English
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: First prime minister of Lithuania after its independence from the Soviet Union. Mr. Lechkar (talk) 07:27, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply

Comment as the first post-Soviet prime minister of a newly independent country, a blurb might be appreciated. In any case, the article needs work: more sources and probably more detail on her political career, especially as prime minister. _-_Alsor ⭐️⭐️ (talk) 09:17, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply
Support blurb per above. Kevinishere15 (talk) 09:59, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Oppose blurb The fact she was the first post-Soviet prime minister of Lithuania isn't a compelling argument for a blurb. In its current shape, the article contains only one paragraph about her premiership, which explains that she was elected to the office by the Supreme Council of Lithuania, she immediately faced troubles as Gorbachev set an economic embargo, she travelled around the world to gain diplomatic support for negotiations with Gorbachev regarding the embargo, and she eventually resigned as a prime minister after nine months. This clearly fails to demonstrate any notability for a blurb. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:03, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Support The article is decently long and in good enough shape. As far as I can see the original nomination was not for a blurb but a RD, which seems reasonable. Yakikaki (talk) 20:24, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply
Support RD Article is of sufficient quality. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 01:05, 1 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Two {CN} tags remaining. Please add more REFs. Also, what did she do as Minister of Agriculture.... etc. -- if it's important enough to be mentioned in the intro (which actually mentioned quite a few jobs), one may expect at least some prose on these parts of her career in the main body of the wikibio. The long intro makes this reader feel that many important details are missing from the wikibio. Glaringly missing was her candidacy and campaigning in the 2004 Lithuanian presidential election. --PFHLai (talk) 19:02, 2 August 2026 (UTC)reply

(Closed) UEFA boycott of FIFA

[edit source]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Articles: UEFA (talk · history · tag) and FIFA Forward Enterprise (talk · history · tag)
Blurb:  UEFA votes to boycott all FIFA tournaments due to the proposed creation of FIFA Forward Enterprise, a $20 billion commercial subsidiary. (Post)
News source(s): BBC CNN The Guardian
Credits:
 ArionStar (talk) 23:16, 30 July 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Oppose, as others have said, this is a threat IF it is carried out.
I'm for a speedy snow close for this one as there is a consensus already forming against posting this.~2026-42382-87 (talk) 02:53, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) 2026 Morocco–Spain border incident

[edit source]
Proposed image
Article: 2026 Morocco–Spain border incident (talk · history · tag)
Blurb:  Thousands of migrants overwhelm the Spanish border with Morocco at Ceuta. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Thousands of migrants from Morocco cross the border with the Spanish city of Ceuta, leaving at least 57 people dead and causing an incident between the countries.
Alternative blurb 2: Tens of thousands of migrants attempt to cross the Moroccan border with Spain at Ceuta, leaving at least 57 migrants dead.
Alternative blurb 3: Sixty thousand migrants cross the Morocco–Spain border at Ceuta, with at least fifty-seven deaths.
News source(s): NYT, Reuters, El Pais
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: This seems to be quite a crisis and dozens have drowned in the attempt. Andrew🐉(talk) 21:36, 30 July 2026 (UTC)reply

Major support. This is being talked about worldwide and is being called worse than the 2021 incident. Over a dozen deaths have been reported today with dozens more possibly caused by it to. Article needs expansion and more citations though. Also sections. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 21:42, 30 July 2026 (UTC)reply
Lean support on notability While incidents at the border between Morocco and Spain aren't new, the current incident is international and is also receiving major sustained coverage. The estimates of the undocumented immigrants that have crossed the Ceuta border have ranged from 2,000 per TVE to about 40,000 per Antena 3. The article needs a bit more expansion before it meets adequate quality for posting. CastleFort1 (talk) 21:55, 30 July 2026 (UTC)reply
Adequate quality met The bolded article now meets sufficient quality for potential posting on ITN. CastleFort1 (talk) 14:52, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply
I think that the flagrantly racist original headline deserves more than a trout. GenevieveDEon (talk) 22:21, 30 July 2026 (UTC)reply
The word "incident" seems too bland and vague while the word "irruption" is too obscure. See WP:EUPHEMISM, Do not assume that plain language is inappropriate. Andrew🐉(talk) 22:22, 30 July 2026 (UTC)reply
Well, calling it an "invasion" is racist. Do better.  Muboshgu (talk) 22:27, 30 July 2026 (UTC)reply
See you at WP:ANI. GenevieveDEon (talk) 23:24, 30 July 2026 (UTC)reply
I’ll second that. The Kip (contribs) 00:17, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply
And to add - 'Thousands of migrants... cross massively the border...' needs a serious grammar tidy-up. GenevieveDEon (talk) 23:39, 30 July 2026 (UTC)reply
Why? ArionStar (talk) 23:44, 30 July 2026 (UTC)reply
Both because in English it would be typical to put the adjective either before the verb or after the object - "they quickly cross the border" or "they cross the border quickly", but not *"they cross quickly the border", and because the English adverb massively is not generally used to mean 'en masse'. GenevieveDEon (talk) 23:49, 30 July 2026 (UTC)reply
"massively", in Wiktionary, means: "In a massive manner, in a way that appears large, heavy or imposing. ArionStar (talk) 23:55, 30 July 2026 (UTC)reply
I have resolved all this I hope agreeably by simply removing "massively". Either way, we tend to avoid such editorialism when writing blurbs. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 00:18, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Oppose blurb, needs further rewriting. The crossing of the border did not "cause" an incident, it was the "incident". There is also no guarantee the migrants were "from Morocco" in an ultimate origin sense, as the blub is written (if it is intended to be geographical, "to Ceuta from Morocco" or similar wold be clearer). No current view on the significance. CMD (talk) 01:53, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Comment Added Altblurb 2 in response to the criticisms of blurbs proposed insofar. I’ll stay undecided on my support or oppose for now considering there’s clearly a lot of discourse around this nom specifically that I do not want to get tangled up in. --SpectralIon 04:57, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply
That's better, but I think the mention of the death toll still misses a key point: all those who have died are migrants who have died in their attempt to reach (perceived) safety. GenevieveDEon (talk) 08:17, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply
Updated Altblurb 2 again based on the new comments while I was sleeping. Altblurb 3 seems to be gaining traction though, so this might not be very impactful. --SpectralIon 17:00, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply
Support on notability/coverage etc but Oppose the current blurbs for some of the issues above. Small fixes without making it too long could be referring to the dead as "migrants" which would get across the point they died attempting to cross. Salmon Of Ignorance (talk) 09:25, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Wait The scale of this crossing is the largest of any single movement across the Morocco-Spain border in years, but key quantitative metrics are still unconfirmed among reliable sources, and the proposed blurbs are too vague to fully capture the full scale of the crossing at present. There is a vast discrepancy in the number of migrants who made the crossing being reported in reliable sources, ranging from 1,000 to more than 50,000 in the past few days. Similarly, the fatalities arising from migrants who tragically died while attempting to make the same crossing is unclear, with Spanish police reports suggesting the total will rise in coming days. Given the mass deployment of Guardia Civil and Army units to Ceuta, I expect we'll have a clearer picture of the full scale of the crossing and related casualties over the weekend. This also gives a good opportunity to improve the quality of the article and flesh out the body as it currently lacks any coherent sections or structure despite being decently well sourced. Oppius Brutus (talk) 10:30, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Wait per Oppius Brutus. I also think it would be good if any blurb specified that Ceuta is in Africa, because a lot of the heat and rhetoric about this tragic situation is eliding that. For instance, Italy is calling for Spain to be suspended from the Schengen Agreement, as though people can just walk from Ceuta to Madrid. GenevieveDEon (talk) 10:34, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Support in principle, oppose these blurbs. This is an unusual incident - official estimates are 49,000 illegal border crossings in one afternoon - and the death toll is substantial. It's a major humanitarian incident. The article is short but does meet our minimum requirements. However all the proposed blurbs are dehumanising and anti-migrant; I particularly dislike 'overwhelm'. The blurb should be a plain factual statement, without emotive terms. Modest Genius talk 10:59, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Comment A key part of a blurb should mention this came after Spain's top court ruled migrants from Morocco crossing into these territories cannot be returned to Morocco. Masem (t) 11:52, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply
    That seems appropriate to explain in the article, but too much detail for the blurb. Modest Genius talk 12:03, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply
  • I've proposed altblurb3, as "crossed" is used by several news outlets (The Guardian, CNN, BBC). An alternative could be "breached" (Al Jazeera, DW, Reuters). Nice4What (talk · contribs) 12:31, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Support Altblurb3 it is simple and to the point. We always should be very cautious when reporting on these kinds of incidents, as we don't want to become a mouthpiece for hateful people. Altblurb3 is the most neutral one. The event seems very notable, and the article seems good enough. I normally would say that we should list the reason for the incident, but it might be a bit too complex to list out in the short blurb.
Gaismagorm (talk) 12:42, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply
Forty-three deaths now. ArionStar (talk) 15:08, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply
Support altblurb3 This blurb is more concise, simple, and neutral than the other blurbs. CastleFort1 (talk) 15:20, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Support A border incident involving illegal migrants with casualties is a very big deal, and the story receives widespread media coverage globally. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:08, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Support Very significant border incident, with several EU countries threatening to "suspend" free travel from Spain. Article looks very complete now. Also significant casualties. Would prefer a blurb that mentions both the currently accepted number of migrants involved, as well as the current number of casualties. Khuft (talk) 18:55, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Support Massively impactful situation, both politically for European relations and in terms of death count. As for the blurb, I think altblurb 3 should be the one that is posted. QuicoleJR (talk|edits) 19:05, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Major support Main talk in European news. Support blurb 1. PalleyCov2030 (talk) 20:20, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Support blurb 3. Some migrants say they were told to attempt to cross the border by Morocco; one country using refugees/migrants as a weapon is certainly noteworthy. Morocco opposes Spanish possession of those two cities. 331dot (talk) 20:33, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply
Support. Covered prominently by major media outlets, article is in decent shape. NICHOLAS NEEDLEHAM (talk) 20:42, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply
Support blurb 3. It gives the most specific number of migrants and has the most neutral tone. Snosibsnob (talk) 21:50, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply
Why? GenevieveDEon (talk) 08:01, 1 August 2026 (UTC)reply
@Spencer: the death toll has now raised to sixty-seven. Could you please update the ITN? Yacàwotçã (talk) 17:07, 1 August 2026 (UTC)reply
@Yacàwotçã: Thanks for the notice. The death toll has just been updated to 67. Next time, you may get a quicker response from WP:ERRORS. --PFHLai (talk) 20:58, 1 August 2026 (UTC)reply

July 29

[edit source]

(Posted) RD: Billy Ray Smith Jr.

[edit source]
Article: Billy Ray Smith Jr. (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Houston Chronicle
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: American football player and College Football Hall of Famer. Article is in pretty good shape bar a section about his broadcasting career. I'll try to sort that out shortly. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 15:24, 30 July 2026 (UTC)reply

Support Article is of sufficient quality for RD. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 00:41, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply

(Ready) RD: Glen Hansard

[edit source]
Article: Glen Hansard (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Irish musician. Died on this date. Could be a blurb Froglord (Finnfrog99) (talk) 10:54, 29 July 2026 (UTC)reply

Comment Surprised to hear this - I will Support after the citation issues are fixes. Salmon Of Ignorance (talk) 11:17, 29 July 2026 (UTC)reply
Last CN tag removed - happy to support RD now, the article looks a lot better than when this was posted. Salmon Of Ignorance (talk) 15:30, 29 July 2026 (UTC)reply
Support outside of the last few tags left. No need for blurb. Greenflipper (talk) 12:06, 29 July 2026 (UTC)reply
Surely this is ready to be posted now. ItsShandog (talk) 07:32, 4 August 2026 (UTC)reply

July 28

[edit source]

(Posted) 2026 Kumamoto earthquake

[edit source]
Article: 2026 Kumamoto earthquake (talk · history · tag)
Blurb:  A magnitude 7.1 earthquake strikes Kyushu, Japan, killing at least 34 people and injuring at least 123 others. (Post)
Alternative blurb: A magnitude 7.1 earthquake strikes Kumamoto, Japan, killing 34 people and injuring at least 123 others.
Alternative blurb 2: A Mw 6.8 earthquake strikes Kyushu, Japan, killing at least 34 people and injuring at least 123 others.
News source(s): Al Jazeera Reuters
Credits:

Nominator's comments: There is a rather significant number of worldwide outlets reporting on this story (currently frontpage on BBC, The Guardian, Reuters, Al Jazeera, NYT, Washington Post etc.), even more so with the ongoing drama with people trapped inside the mall. ~2026-41912-68 (talk) 12:19, 28 July 2026 (UTC)reply

(Posted) RD: Kavinsky

[edit source]
Article: Kavinsky (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Variety
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: French DJ. Found dead on this date. Greenflipper (talk) 10:37, 29 July 2026 (UTC)reply

Oppose for now as there is an orange tag for unsourced material. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 19:19, 30 July 2026 (UTC)reply
That orange banner was deleted, the discography is now sourced Golan1911 (talk) 05:13, 1 August 2026 (UTC)reply

References

[edit source]

Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com] rather than using <ref></ref> tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.

For the times when <ref></ref> tags are being used, here are their contents: