Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2943ed0ecbf26ee

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 May 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 1

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)reply

File:Bell Eagle Eye, Model 918.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cewlt (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Image is sourced with a web forum with an assertion it is released to the public domain by rcgroups.net but the permission link points to a page on the US Coast Guard site which does not have this image on it. The RCgroups forum index page states "All RCGroups content copyright © 1996 - 2016 by RCGroups.com." so it's hard to reconcile that statement with a public domain license. Whpq (talk) 04:59, 1 May 2016 (UTC)reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 03:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)reply

File:Jeanne wedding.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jeanne boleyn (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Photo of uploader; uploader's pose suggests that this is not a selfie, and was taken by someone else. Missing evidence of permission FASTILY 05:43, 1 May 2016 (UTC)reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 03:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)reply

File:Jeanne in Taormina 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jeanne boleyn (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Photo of uploader; uploader's pose suggests that this is not a selfie, and was taken by someone else. Missing evidence of permission FASTILY 05:44, 1 May 2016 (UTC)reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 03:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)reply

File:Jeanne B2.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jeanne boleyn (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Photo of uploader; uploader's pose suggests that this is not a selfie, and was taken by someone else. Missing evidence of permission FASTILY 05:44, 1 May 2016 (UTC)reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 03:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)reply

File:Dublin Jeanne boleyn.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jeanne boleyn (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Photo of uploader; uploader's pose suggests that this is not a selfie, and was taken by someone else. Missing evidence of permission FASTILY 05:44, 1 May 2016 (UTC)reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)reply

File:St Sebastians Church ayarkunnam.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Unknownuserkottayam123 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Claimed as "own work", but rthe image has a watermark in the lower right corner stating what appears to be "Thomson Photography". The uploader has a history of copyright violations which include lying about copyright status. Examples include Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 April 17#File:Dalailamachrist.jpg where he claimed an AP press photo as one he took, and Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 April 17#File:Assumptionchrist.jpg where he claimed a university photo had been released by the university under a CC license when he knew it was not. Whpq (talk) 14:04, 1 May 2016 (UTC)reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 22:13, 1 May 2016 (UTC)reply

File:Vnit crest.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Andy roddick123 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Given that this is a logo (and available here as non-free fair use, I think it's unlikely this is the own work of the uploader. -- samtar talk or stalk 14:56, 1 May 2016 (UTC)reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: 'remove from List of X-planes. — ξxplicit 01:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)reply

File:Boeing X-50A.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by The Bushranger (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#8 in List of X-planes and WP:NFCC#9 in User:Kees08/sandbox. Stefan2 (talk) 20:24, 1 May 2016 (UTC)reply

Removed from the sandbox. It does not fail NFCC8 in the list as the list includes an image of every unclassified X-Plane; its inclusion as part of the set significantly increases readers' understanding of the topic, and its removal would be detrimental to that understanding. (Also, since the use in Boeing X-50 Dragonfly is not in question, listing at FfD was, IMHO, not appropriate - it should have been WP:BOLDly removed if you felt it was inappropriatly used in some, but not all, cases.) - The Bushranger One ping only 05:16, 7 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Wikipedia does not need a list of planes which contains photos of the planes. A list would be equally easy to understand by linking to articles about the planes. Therefore, any non-free photos in the list fail WP:NFCC#8. See WP:NFC#UUI §6 and WP:NFLISTS. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:22, 8 May 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: convert to fair use. — ξxplicit 01:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)reply

File:TVC Vertical Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Chenedamor (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Logo is felt to be above TOO Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)reply

File:Institute of Public Enterprise (IPE) comprising Naveen Kumar and Zuhair Ali from Hyderabad, emerged International winners edging out Symbiosis Law School.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mekaeel Shaik (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Claimed as own work, this image was part of a press release and the full image can be found here. We would need some proof that the uploader holds the copyright. Whpq (talk) 23:51, 1 May 2016 (UTC)reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.