Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 December 25
December 25
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- File:Confitmirt-login.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Superzohar (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails to comply with WP:NFCC, articles 8 (contextual significance) and article 10. Basically, it is impossible to tell what this image is showing beyond "some sort of login screen for something called ConfirmIt". (But is it a PC app, a web app or anything else?) Therefore, it adds no value to its article; its article also does not even mention it. It doesn't even have a proper source, so that one can find out what it is. Codename Lisa (talk) 01:18, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- File:Seegene's official logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Seegene1 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unused logo. Seegene was deleted. Stefan2 (talk) 17:14, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- File:Agglomerated marble stone process.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by RollingWave (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
See c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Agglomerated marble stone process.jpg. Not compliant with WP:NFCC#1. Stefan2 (talk) 22:03, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Citing WP:NFCC#1 without providing an alternative file? the topic regards to a purely commercial sector, this makes finding a file who's source is not tied to a company somehow nearly impossible. {RollingWave (talk) 01:07, 26 December 2014 (UTC)}
- Anyone could easily create a freely licensed drawing. --Stefan2 (talk) 02:26, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- Then draw one, until such point isn't it just presumption that one can be redrawn? since it definitely fits the first part of the criteria " Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available" the second half we can essentially assume to be true for almost every copyright picture if the accuser is not liable to provide proof or alternative. and highly subjective to what is actually a viable replacement draw and what is not depending on the picture. {RollingWave (talk) 05:21, 26 December 2014 (UTC)}
- WP:NFCC#1 tells that non-free files can't be used when a freely licensed file easily could be produced. In this case, we seem to have a drawing of commonly available items (for example large stones), falling under WP:NFC#UUI §1. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:02, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- Then draw one, until such point isn't it just presumption that one can be redrawn? since it definitely fits the first part of the criteria " Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available" the second half we can essentially assume to be true for almost every copyright picture if the accuser is not liable to provide proof or alternative. and highly subjective to what is actually a viable replacement draw and what is not depending on the picture. {RollingWave (talk) 05:21, 26 December 2014 (UTC)}
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- File:Book Cover The Second Coming of Christ The Resurrection of Christ Within.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Red Rose 13 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC#8: this should only be used in the article about the book, but not in Second Coming. Stefan2 (talk) 23:23, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.