Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2012 January 25
- Hutschenreuther (history · last edit) from http://books.google.be/books?id=LolP8HO6wQQC&pg=PA35&lpg=PA35&dq=%22a+symbol+of+excellence+that+continues+to+this+day%22&source=bl&ots=B8z8K2qKYf&sig=-qTZbo3wNYQ-eqfe-I8oxkXG1Ls&hl=en&sa=X&ei=p70fT76XIcLpOdL4sK4O&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22a%20symbol%20of%20excellence%20that%20continues%20to%20this%20day%22&f=false. Fram (talk) 08:34, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- I can't assess this one. I can't see the book to compare the rewrite, and Richard doesn't always rewrite thoroughly enough on his first go. Can somebody else see it? --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:47, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
- Weird. I couldn't access it when I clicked on the link here but it returned something when I clicked on the link on the actual article page. Anyway what I can see is:
- I can't assess this one. I can't see the book to compare the rewrite, and Richard doesn't always rewrite thoroughly enough on his first go. Can somebody else see it? --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:47, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Karl Magnus Hutschenreuther established done of the first private porcelain factories in Germany at Hohenberg in 1814. In 1845, his son Lorenz founded his own Hutschenreuther Porcelain company in Selb. The branches of the company were united in 1969. In the early part of the 20th century, Hutschenreuther grew quickly by absorbing factories at Altrohlau (1909), Arzburg (1918) and Tirschenreuth (1927). The Hutschenreuther "Mark of the Lion" is a symbol of excellence that continues to this day. This is a representation of the 300 most popular Hutschenreuther patterns
- So there may be some concerns there. That appears to be all the substantial text for some pages in either direction. There may be the odd typo in that quote as well as I had to type it in. (I'm working on the theory that the quote is fair use while we investigate - I guess it should probably be removed once we're done). Dpmuk (talk) 06:35, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. I feel comfortable with fair use in this situation. I understand that Google books works that way, which is one reason why some people don't think links to it should be included in citations. What I can see is not always what you can see, but I'm very glad you can see it. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:31, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- So there may be some concerns there. That appears to be all the substantial text for some pages in either direction. There may be the odd typo in that quote as well as I had to type it in. (I'm working on the theory that the quote is fair use while we investigate - I guess it should probably be removed once we're done). Dpmuk (talk) 06:35, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:46, 12 February 2012 (UTC)